Leica Tri-Elmar 28-35-50mm f4

Started Jan 9, 2012 | Discussions thread
Paul Richman
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,058Gear list
Like?
Thanks again, Dr Rohde...
In reply to Dr. Ulrich Rohde, Jan 10, 2012

Dr. Ulrich Rohde wrote:

I did not find it weak, but a detcated 28 or 35 is alsways a good choice if you dont add up buying 28/35 and 50 Leica or Zeiss. Zeiss actually is a goot alternative, the 3 lenses at 2.8 maybe less then 1 TriElmar.

Yes, I agree. I have 4 Zeiss ZF.2 lenses, and have loved working with them. But now I want smaller, lighter, zoom if possible, but with high IQ, not necessarily the absolute highest IQ, but high.

Not easy choices

True. This shift from Nikon to "smaller, lighter" has been rather mind-boggling, but, also, fun. I leave in a month for a two week photography trip in the western US, and want to get all this ready for that trip, which will involve some strenuous hiking, hopefully with a light, high quality, system.

-- hide signature --

Paul Richman
Pixels By Paul

 Paul Richman's gear list:Paul Richman's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Fisheye-Nikkor 16mm f/2.8D +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow