|
Re: 18-105 vs 16-85
In reply to LeonardoG,
Jan 4, 2012
|
I've been contemplating both these lenses recently. For what it's worth, DXOMark puts the 18-105 sharper than the 16-85 at wider focal lengths, while they have the 16-85 sharper at longer focal lengths. Which is a little ironic, if you think about it.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2012 | |||
| Jan 3, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 4, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 5, 2012 | |||
| Jan 6, 2012 | |||
| Jan 6, 2012 |