|
exactly
In reply to Simon Stanmore,
Dec 15, 2011
|
Simon Stanmore wrote:
Ron Kruger wrote:
There seems to be a fascination with very fast primes among enthusiasts for portrait shots, and although this is not what I do, I'm wondering if pros who specialize in portraits use very fast lenses?
Is there a market for shots with one ear in focus and the other out? Or with just the nose in focus? Seems to me f-2.8, proper lighting and background placement would be plenty fast, and in fact, too fast for some applications. Have customers ever heard of bokeh, or do you often get comments about the shot being "out of focus?"
--
In the end, the only things that matter are the people we help and the people we hurt. http://pa.photoshelter.com/user/ronkruger
80%+ of my portraits use either a 100mm f/2 @ around f/2.8 or 50mm f/1.4 @ around f/2.
Yes there's a market but that's not why I choose to shoot this way. I shoot this way because I'm a photographer - a 'light writer' (anc.Greek) - not an illustrator.
The optical effects inherent to photography are great part of its visual appeal to me.
No one ever thinks anything is out of focus... Nothing is out of focus.
agreed, completely
then why this new wave of sales of cheap fast primes lately? I think that's because of the video, people like to experiment the bokeh with a cheap prime without spending too much on a real portrait lens.
the 100mm (canon) at 2.8 is just about perfect in that regards, for stills.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2011 | |||
| Dec 9, 2011 | |||
| Dec 9, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 9, 2011 | |||
| Dec 9, 2011 | |||
| Dec 9, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 14, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 10, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 11, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 13, 2011 | |||
| Dec 14, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 12, 2011 | |||
| Dec 13, 2011 | |||
| Dec 13, 2011 | |||
| Dec 13, 2011 | |||
| Dec 14, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 31, 2011 | |||
| Jan 3, 2012 | |||
| Jan 11, 2012 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 16, 2011 | |||
| Dec 16, 2011 | |||
| Dec 16, 2011 | |||
| Dec 17, 2011 | |||
| Dec 17, 2011 | |||
| Dec 17, 2011 | |||
| Dec 17, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 14, 2011 | |||
| Dec 15, 2011 | |||
| Dec 16, 2011 | |||
| Dec 31, 2011 | |||
| Dec 26, 2011 | |||
| Jan 1, 2012 | |||
| Jan 17, 2012 |