|
Re: CANON EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
In reply to garyw1,
Dec 8, 2011
|
garyw1 wrote:
Probably already discussed but I had an accident and trashed my 10/20 ...my 28/70 has been through too many wars and needs replaced.
I have a 50 1.2 a 135 f2...70/200 2.8 and a 100 2.8 macro.
Was thinking of getting the 16/35 which actually could take the place almost of the 10/20 and 28/70 and fit the 7D and 5D where as the 10/20 didn't.
Whats the real scoop on that lens...Thanks.
--
'The moment you think you're great is the moment you quit learning.'
http://www.gawalters.com
16-35 II (vI is really bad) is too wide on FF for my liking, but really good for everyday shooting on aps-c (even better on aps-h). resolution is not the best but not bad either (and no better zoom in that range available).
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2011 | |||
| Dec 1, 2011 | |||
| Dec 1, 2011 | |||
| Dec 1, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 1, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 2, 2011 | |||
| Dec 8, 2011 | |||
| Dec 8, 2011 | |||
| Dec 8, 2011 | |||
| Dec 8, 2011 |