From PC magazine review 5N high ISO worse than C3

Started Oct 27, 2011 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Jefftan
Senior MemberPosts: 1,112
Like?
From PC magazine review 5N high ISO worse than C3
Oct 27, 2011

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394905,00.asp#fbid=gC5g4xLleya

Do you guys in this forum agree?

In terms of low-light performance, the NEX-5N doesn't do as well as the C3. The 5N is able to keep noise below 1.5 percent, the mark at which an image becomes overly grainy, through ISO 3200. The NEX-C3 performed one stop better, capturing clean images through ISO 6400. Even though it doesn't see in the dark as effectively as the C3, the 5N outperforms the latest batch of Micro Four Thirds cameras in this metric. The Olympus E-PL3 can only record clean images through ISO 800, just crossing the 1.5 percent mark at ISO 1600.

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow