Why FF cameras should be always on top of DSLR/SLT line?

Started Oct 13, 2011 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
gurxi
New MemberPosts: 6
Like?
Why FF cameras should be always on top of DSLR/SLT line?
Oct 13, 2011

For those (like me) who were used to shoot in the film days, with "normal" SLR cameras (like Dynax/Maxxum 505si) using FF lens, it's difficult to understand why, if we want to shoot in a similar way in the digital world, we'll have to spend a lot of money buying a FF DSLR/SLT.

In these days, it's quit common to associate FF cameras to pro users, while only some years ago every photo enthusiast was a 35mm ("FF") user.

So I miss a parallel roadmap for FF cameras in the same way than APS-C roadmap, from A2xx to A7xx, from low camera specs for enthusiast to proffesional specs (like A900/850), assuming a bigger price for FF mainly due to sensor cost.

Maybe I'm the only one with this point of view, and I'd like to hear about yours ...

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
10+New
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow