Comparison D90 to D300s

Started Sep 18, 2011 | Discussions thread
Tony Beach
Senior MemberPosts: 4,771
Like?
Speak for yourself
In reply to cmvsm, Sep 23, 2011

cmvsm wrote:

The guy primarily shoots landscapes and historical buildings.

"I shoot mainly landscapes, wildlife, historic buildings etc."

How did you curtail your response to the OP's needs?

It's not up to me to determine which (if any) of the features to omit that the D300/D300s has that the D90 does not. To varying degrees, I consider all of those features I listed as worth noting, and the best part of that post is that I think it was reasonably comprehensive.

You might want to quantify your blanket statement before throwing it out there.

As opposed to your "blanket statement" which ironically omitted that the OP shoots wildlife?

IMO, the D90 is all that the OP will need, and then some, based on what he shoots.

IMO you are wrong, but then I'm only presuming to speak for myself. I would miss the bigger buffer, the extra fps, the 100% viewfinder, and MLU; and I think the OP would like to have the extra bracketing capabilities and perhaps 14 bits too, since HDR was mentioned.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow