FX vs DX for wide angle landscapes

Started Aug 24, 2011 | Discussions thread
Pradipta Dutta
Veteran MemberPosts: 9,764Gear list
Like?
That would be comparing apples to oranges
In reply to rbmphoto, Sep 1, 2011

If you are comparing DX to FX, you need to keep the field of view same, which means, if you used 50mm on DX, you need to use 75mm on FX. Otherwise, you would be comparing apples to oranges.

rbmphoto wrote:

If you use the same lens from the same place, the pixel count from a D3/D700 will be 5.2+million covering the same area. The pixel count is only the same if you frame your shot differently or use different lens.

Same lens, same distance, you'll put more pixels on the same area (the DX area) with a DX camera - if you take more DX photos to cover the same FX area, you are doubling+ your DX pixel count, again more pixel density.

The primary landscape photographer on this forum for many years, before he recently left in a huff, was Roman Johnston - you might google his many threads and see why he chose DX cameras instead of FX or MF cameras (both of which he also had) for his work (hint: resolution).

-- hide signature --
 Pradipta Dutta's gear list:Pradipta Dutta's gear list
Nikon D2X Nikon D3 Nikon D800 Nikon D3200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow