POOL: Would you buy a FX f 2.0 zoom ?

Started Aug 9, 2011 | Discussions thread
tigrebleu
Senior MemberPosts: 2,020
Like?
Re: In order to keep construction costs down on what would be
In reply to xjassa, Aug 20, 2011

xjassa wrote:

an extremely expensive lens,

I'd be happy with shortening up the focal length.

50-85mm F2.0 would be a killer portrait/casual zoom, IMO.

As long as it's not a remake of the dreaded Nikkor 43-86mm, I'm in.

But a 50-85mm F/2 lens, although a bit too short for my tastes, would be a nice lens to add to a D700 + 16-35mm F/4 kit...! I could live with the 35-50mm gap: one step foward or back is all it takes to overcome that!

-- hide signature --

If photography can be considered like painting, then I'm still at the preschool "paint with your fingers" level.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
OnlyNew
(unknown member)
No.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow