POOL: Would you buy a FX f 2.0 zoom ?

Started Aug 9, 2011 | Discussions thread
tigrebleu
Senior MemberPosts: 2,020
Like?
Re: In order to keep construction costs down on what would be
In reply to xjassa, Aug 20, 2011

xjassa wrote:

an extremely expensive lens,

I'd be happy with shortening up the focal length.

50-85mm F2.0 would be a killer portrait/casual zoom, IMO.

As long as it's not a remake of the dreaded Nikkor 43-86mm, I'm in.

But a 50-85mm F/2 lens, although a bit too short for my tastes, would be a nice lens to add to a D700 + 16-35mm F/4 kit...! I could live with the 35-50mm gap: one step foward or back is all it takes to overcome that!

-- hide signature --

If photography can be considered like painting, then I'm still at the preschool "paint with your fingers" level.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
OnlyNew
No.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow