Canon less accessorized than Nikon?

Started Jul 29, 2011 | Discussions thread
OSAM
Regular MemberPosts: 489
Like?
Re: Canon less accessorized than Nikon?
In reply to scorrpio, Aug 10, 2011

scorrpio wrote:

The argument can go the other way, too. If you don't need the dome diffuser and filters (say, you already own a few 'softbox' attachments), with Nikon you still have to pay for them. With Canon, you pay just for the flash, and can accessorize as needed.

Uhhh...

Nikon Sb-700, B&H: $330.
Canon 430EXII, B&H: $300.

A $30 difference, but considering the 430 has been around for dog's years and the 700 just came out a few months ago, that's about the right amount of depreciation over time.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow