Michael Reichmann explains the SD1 price...

Started Jul 23, 2011 | Discussions thread
RedValley
Forum MemberPosts: 84
Like?
Re: Perhaps we are to blaim, though only partially
In reply to maple, Jul 26, 2011

maple wrote:

After all, SD1 is unique and can be the best, if not the only, choice if you really need the best possible image quality in good light in a smallest and lightest possible package (i.e., when the heavy, bulky and clumsy MF or even FF is not an option).

I'm not convinced about the "heaviness" and "bulkiness" of FF vs SD1:

  • SIGMA SD1: 146 ×113 × 80 mm, 700 grams

  • SONY A900: 156 x 117 x 82 mm, 850 grams

  • CANON 5DmkII: 152 x 114 x 75 mm, 810 grams

(all of them w/o battery)

Still comparable, IMO.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
lølNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow