SD1: a stupid statement

Started May 25, 2011 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
lightmagic
Senior MemberPosts: 1,410
Like?
SD1: a stupid statement
May 25, 2011

Talking about the pricing of SD1, Michael Reichman wrote:" No matter how good the image quality it's still a $1,000 camera."
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/rationalizing_the_irrational.shtml
Did you read it?
"No matter how good the image quality."
Is he a photographer? does he buy cameras just because of the names alone?

The whole purpose of a camera is to get the best possible image quality, for the price. Why else does D3x costs more than D7000?

Now I don't know how good the SD1's image quality is, but that is not the point here.

If its image quality is as good as a MF digital and better than the ones of D3x? I May jump in and buy one. Many would.

-- hide signature --

The Lightmagician
Sun is my eye
Winds my breaths
Sky my open Mind.
MTFBWY
http://www.lightmagical.com

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow