2 bad lens from B&H, what is the odd

Started Apr 21, 2011 | Discussions thread
Cope
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,165Gear list
Like?
Re: No bad lens from B&H, what is the odd
In reply to ElanR, Apr 23, 2011

ElanR wrote:

henryp wrote:

viclauyyc wrote:

Sigh. I just order a Tokina 100mm for my D3. First one has problem with the aperture, sometime it show the max aperture as 2.8, most other time is 5.6 or 3.2 or something in between. So I send it back to BH for exchange. The second copy behave the same.

I'm sorry for any inconvenience you experienced but as others here have explained, neither of your lenses was defective. So, your first lens came back to us with a report it was bad when it apparently was not. What should an ethical retailer do with this item?

-- hide signature --

Henry Posner
B&H Photo-Video

I have a question for you, Henry. What do you do with a lens that is returned because someone simply changed their mind?

Elan, how are you, my friend? I imagine B&H will sell it at a reduced price, if they haven't already returned it. It's a shame lenses like this are returned, it just costs all of us money in the long haul.
--

'A man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.'
Winston Churchill

 Cope's gear list:Cope's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 (IF) DX +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow