|
Fast Prime Lenses film vs digital.
Mar 17, 2011
|
I have an old OM1n with a 50mm f1.4 and a 75-150 f4. Is it really worth getting a DSLR when an equally fast 50mm prime by itself costs over $300?
I don't use the OM1n that much anymore; only when I want great bokeh or if I need lens speed to boost the effectiveness of my flash. Then I get my film processed and images put on a CD. Most of my shooting is now with a small digital with a fast zoom range but no bokeh whatsoever.
I'm happy with the quality of my film images; are DSLR images that much better than film SLR images? Are fast digital primes equal or better than their film counterparts?
--
http://Dos-Ojos.smugmug.com/gallery/1230729/1/57651866
http://Dos-Ojos.smugmug.com/gallery/1230755/1/57652842
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 18, 2011 | |||
| Mar 18, 2011 | |||
| Mar 17, 2011 | |||
| Mar 18, 2011 | |||
| Mar 18, 2011 |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
