Is CZ 16-105 better than Sony 18-250

Started Feb 21, 2011 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Ruvy
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,622
Like?
Is CZ 16-105 better than Sony 18-250
Feb 21, 2011

Still debating about walk around and travel lens.

Most I have read in this forum points to CZ16-105 being better than the Sony 18-250. Yet, when I read professional review in trusty Photozone it seems entirely the other way around - 12-250 is far better than 16-105 in most tests.

1- Sony 18-250 http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/294-tamron-af-18-250mm-f35-63-di-ii-ld-aspherical-if-macro-nikon-lab-test-report--review?start=1
2- CZ 16-105 http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/384-sony_16105_3556?start=1

Must be something I am missing - what is it? have anyone ran comparisons? I am concerned only about photographic qualities - I am aware of the 2mm width advantage of one vs. longer tele of the other. .

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow