|
So why isn't there a 30-100mm 2.8?
Jan 14, 2011
|
Crazy I know, but that seems perfect to me.
Why do I have to buy a 16-50 and 50-135, or 28-75 and a 70-200?
Am I the only one that feels a 30-100mm 2.8 would be great? or better yet 1.8
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 14, 2011 | |||
| Jan 15, 2011 | |||
| Jan 15, 2011 | |||
| Jan 15, 2011 |