The DX vs. FX false choice

From Thom Hogan's D7000 review: "As I've been trying to tell people for some time, you're either a DX user or an FX user... So we've come to a time when you need to make a decision: am I DX or FX?"

Huh? How's this anything but a false choice? Would it be possible that a photographer could enjoy the benefits of a DX body (more reach, lighter weight, etc.) in one setting, then have a need for FX in another (shallower DOF, better low light performance, etc.)? Or are we to say all those who carry both types of bodies in their bag are misguided?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It's easy to argue about equipment and technique, but hard to argue with a good photograph -- and more difficult to capture one .

Gallery and blog: http://esfotoclix.com
Special selections: http://esfotoclix.com/store
Wedding & Portrait: http://esfotoclix.com/wedevent
Flickr stream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/22061657@N03