Forum indexOlympus SLR TalkChange forum

K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples

Started Dec 18, 2010 | Discussions thread

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Flat view

Kurt Petersen

Senior Member • Posts: 2,507

Like?

K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples

Dec 18, 2010

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk5/
--

You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller

Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Flat view

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples	Kurt Petersen	Dec 18, 2010
Re: K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples	Shooter907	Dec 18, 2010
Re: K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples	cjlacz	Dec 18, 2010
Re: K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples	Leo	Dec 18, 2010
Its funny to see...	PetarM	Dec 18, 2010
Very poor details from E-5 compare samples...whats happening here?	Abbar	Dec 18, 2010
No,	Timskis6	Dec 18, 2010
E-5 definitely held it's own	dpalugyay	Dec 18, 2010
Re: E-5 definitely held it's own	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
Re: E-5 definitely held it's own	PetarM	Dec 18, 2010
The e-5 JPEG engine is really nice, but after that....	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Details?	Timskis6	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Details?	sderdiarian	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Details?	_wtf_	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Details?	sderdiarian	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Details?	Shooter907	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Details?	Timskis6	Dec 18, 2010
Quite in topic....	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Re: The e-5 JPEG engine is really nice, but after that....	_wtf_	Dec 18, 2010
Re: The e-5 JPEG engine is really nice, but after that....	MAFAv8r	Dec 18, 2010
Let me illustrate...	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
While not doubting the difference	Brent Lossing	Dec 18, 2010
Re: While not doubting the difference	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
that example doesn't come even close....	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Re: that example doesn't come even close....	_wtf_	Dec 19, 2010
Re: that example doesn't come even close....	jonny1976	Dec 19, 2010
Demonstration how far off your example is:	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Here you go (edit Add pict)	Brent Lossing	Dec 20, 2010
I would have used the tripod ;)	Sergey_Green	Dec 18, 2010
Haha, that shot was on purpose. Yes I live on Frisco for now(n/t)	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Re: The e-5 JPEG engine is really nice, but after that....	illy	Dec 18, 2010
Correct, see my reply to MAFA8vr (n/t)	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Re: The e-5 JPEG engine is really nice, but after that....	mehrdad	Dec 18, 2010
You can see all the captures around...	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
I still believe it's the tiny sensor. 12mp may be too much.	mdono	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Very poor details from E-5 compare samples...whats happening here?	Shooter907	Dec 18, 2010
I am looking at page 12 comparison...	Abbar	Dec 18, 2010
Bring up the EPL-1 and...	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
Re: I am looking at page 12 comparison...	MAFAv8r	Dec 18, 2010
There is something wrong with the E-5 Samples	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
RAW level noise reduction?	rovingtim	Dec 18, 2010
No	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
Re: No	rovingtim	Dec 18, 2010
In jpeg, yes	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Very poor details from E-5 compare samples...whats happening here?	J2Gphoto	Dec 19, 2010
Is there a change ...	BamaPanda	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Is there a change ...	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Is there a change ...	Big Ga	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Impressive camera, perhaps not so impressive review	tinternaut	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Impressive camera, perhaps not so impressive review	Torsten Hoff	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Impressive camera, perhaps not so impressive review	Diogopin	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Impressive camera, perhaps not so impressive review	Shooter907	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Impressive camera, perhaps not so impressive review	tinternaut	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Impressive camera, perhaps not so impressive review	Diogopin	Dec 18, 2010
Soft, or is it just me?	rednefed	Dec 18, 2010
EPL-1 vs E-5, .....let alone Canikon & K-5	Bijan_iran	Dec 18, 2010
Re: EPL-1 vs E-5, .....let alone Canikon & K-5	rovingtim	Dec 18, 2010
Re: EPL-1 vs E-5, .....let alone Canikon & K-5	Doug Marsh	Dec 19, 2010
a little dose of reality	rovingtim	Dec 18, 2010
E-5 vs EPL-1	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
seen that too on the IR comparometer	radix1	Dec 18, 2010
Re: E-5 vs EPL-1	Stu 5	Dec 18, 2010
Well I don't what it is then	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
In defense of Oly	rovingtim	Dec 18, 2010
The jpeg is bad as well	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
Re: The jpeg is bad as well	rovingtim	Dec 19, 2010
Re: The jpeg is bad as well	Gregm61	Dec 19, 2010
Re: The jpeg is bad as well	Rriley	Dec 19, 2010
Re: The jpeg is bad as well	_wtf_	Dec 19, 2010
Re: The jpeg is bad as well	revio	Dec 20, 2010
Not worth 1700 bucks for sure!	mdono	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Not worth 1700 bucks for sure!	Rriley	Dec 19, 2010
I was talking about the Adobe Raw engine.	rovingtim	Dec 19, 2010
Re: E-5 vs EPL-1	Thomas_A	Dec 19, 2010
Re: a little dose of reality	Franka T.L.	Dec 18, 2010
Re: a little dose of reality	HarjTT	Dec 18, 2010
EPL1 RAw more detail than E5	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
Re: EPL1 RAw more detail than E5	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
Re: EPL1 RAw more detail than E5	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
Re: EPL1 RAw more detail than E5	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
E5 RAW files not possible to download	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
Re: E5 RAW files not possible to download	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
Re: E5 RAW files not possible to download	illy	Dec 18, 2010
These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
My evidence is common sense.	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: My evidence is common sense.	msusic	Dec 18, 2010
Re: My evidence is common sense.	Ramón	Dec 18, 2010
Re: My evidence is common sense.	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	alxdava	Dec 18, 2010
Re: These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
Re: These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
RAW EPL-1 file more detail than D7000 file at iso 100	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
Re: RAW EPL-1 file more detail than D7000 file at iso 100	nams	Dec 18, 2010
or maybe.......	illy	Dec 18, 2010
Re: or maybe.......Nope!	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
you're missing a vital piece of equipment	illy	Dec 18, 2010
Re: you're missing a vital piece of equipment	nams	Dec 18, 2010
And meaning what?	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: And meaning what?	nams	Dec 18, 2010
Re: And meaning what?	illy	Dec 18, 2010
So now we can expect a tainted E-5 review !!! n/t	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: And meaning what?	WGArts2	Dec 20, 2010
Same scene as Canon 60D (nt)	Thomas_A	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Same scene as Canon 60D (nt)	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Yes! That's commonsense! Dpreview modified the EXIF to fake the E-5!	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Yes! That's commonsense! Dpreview modified the EXIF to fake the E-5!	nams	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Yes! That's commonsense! Dpreview modified the EXIF to fake the E-5!	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Yes! That's commonsense! Dpreview modified the EXIF to fake the E-5!	Rikke Rask	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Yes! That's commonsense! Dpreview modified the EXIF to fake the E-5!	_wtf_	Dec 18, 2010
Phil Askey would never have allowed altered EXIF data!	Marty4650	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Phil Askey would never have allowed altered EXIF data!	Rriley	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Yes! That's commonsense! Dpreview modified the EXIF to fake the E-5!	IZO100	Dec 20, 2010
I don't think so	Tbolt47	Dec 18, 2010
Took the shot before the move	Brent Lossing	Dec 18, 2010
Re: These are not E-5 files, but manipulated E-P? files.	AccidntlTourist	Dec 20, 2010
E-5 as good as 7D and D7000, but the Pentax is better	Mr.NoFlash	Dec 18, 2010
German ColorFoto again...	mujana	Dec 18, 2010
Re: German ColorFoto again...	nams	Dec 18, 2010
Re: German ColorFoto again...	mujana	Dec 18, 2010
R5=E5 ofcourse	mujana	Dec 18, 2010
Re: German ColorFoto again...	43photo	Dec 18, 2010
And some of the same "e-5 praising reviews" put the K-5 ahead (n/t)	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
That's what Color Foto does:-)	mujana	Dec 18, 2010
So my findings above are confirmed [nt]	Mr.NoFlash	Dec 18, 2010
I have to give Pentax a pat on the back.	krh_57	Dec 18, 2010
Fortunately Pentax already has lenses that do match the body...	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Goffen	Dec 18, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Jarda_Houdek	Dec 18, 2010
Odd results ....	Doug Brown	Dec 18, 2010
Re: Odd results ....	Rriley	Dec 18, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Jon Schick	Dec 18, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	revio	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	d3xmeister	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Rriley	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	_wtf_	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Rriley	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	_wtf_	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	John King	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Great Bustard	Dec 20, 2010
Re: How about the dustbuster and the IS ?	Raist3d	Dec 18, 2010
It would be nice if your keep your E-420	Mr.NoFlash	Dec 19, 2010
Re: K-5 Review posted, with E-5 comparison samples	Gregm61	Dec 18, 2010
Something is wrong with the image comparison	J2Gphoto	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Something is wrong with the image comparison	Gregm61	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Something is wrong with the image comparison	J2Gphoto	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Something is wrong with the image comparison	Rriley	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Something is wrong with the image comparison	Rriley	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Something is wrong with the image comparison	mcabato	Dec 19, 2010
Re: Something is wrong with the image comparison	ginsbu	Dec 19, 2010

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

10 reasons why a cell phone is better than a D800e	128
Creating a film look	118
Weekly X Series Photo Thread 16th June, 2013	83
Always expose for the sky?	66
EF500mmf5.6LIS	53
The Weekly 4/3 DSLR Images 13 06 17	46
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	44
Light lens for birding?	43
14mm kit lens, worth it or not?	41
Olympus alternative to Lumix 12-35???	40
Ruined nex	38
LF1 - Maximum Aperture at Various Focal Lengths	38
Unpredictable and fast-moving subjects ...	37
Any really good kit lens coming for the NEX ...	36
JPEG vs. RAW - An experiment	34
A good cat picture with the Olympus 17mm 1.8 ...	32
HELP!!! - Dust spots on my A77	32
Survey:	31
Share an image because of it's color	29
Tips for improving a B&W conversion	27