|
What's the point of the new GF2?
Nov 3, 2010
|
So if a GF2 + 14mm lens is about a LX5 in size . . . why would one pick the GF2?
The high ISO results of a G2 sensor are not that outstanding, compared to the already decent LX5. The LX5 has a faster lens and a wider lens, and of course has zoom.
Sure you can pop a 20mm 1.7 on it and get some nice shallow depth of field, but with a tiny tiny GF2 body, any larger lens would me awkward and unbalanced. (i.e., I try to imagine the upcoming Voightlander 0.95 25mm – not a pretty sight).
So, really, without a clear advantage over the LX5 what’s the point?
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 5, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 5, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 3, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 5, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 | |||
| Nov 4, 2010 |