Who needs trolls ...

Gidday All

With all the negativity here today, I ask myself " Who needs trolls ... ".

Seems to me that everyone is forgetting that a camera is an imaging machine, and in this regard, what little info there is points to the E-5 being rather good at this (Imaging Resource user review).

So I reckon that an awful lot of people here are going off at half-cock ...

UNTIL such a time as we see some reviews (however they may turn out), there can be no legitimate or meaningful comments passed on this camera.

As I have said elsewhere, it may be terrific, or it may be terrible - or somewhere in between. Until there are some reviews from some respected sites done, and a few user reviews start coming in from early adopters ( ... ... I love early adopters ... ), no one can say anything really relevant about this camera.

It needs to have a good balance of low/high ISO performance; excellent low/mid ISO IQ; terrific S-AF and C-AF - fast and accurate; excellent resolution; terrific metering ... etc.

Did I miss something, or do we know absolutely nothing about any of these things yet?

--
Regards, john from Melbourne, Australia.
(see profile for current gear)
Please do not embed images from my web site without prior permission
I consider this to be a breach of my copyright.
-- -- --

The Camera doth not make the Man (or Woman) ...
Perhaps being kind to cats, dogs & children does ...

Gallery: http://canopuscomputing.com.au/gallery2/main.php

Bird Control Officers on active service.

Member of UK (and abroad) Photo Safari Group