GF-1 v. EPL-1

This question has probably been asked a bunch of times already but.......

I'm about to make a purchase and can't decide which camera that I want. The m4/3 format really interests me. The compact size, image quality, I like the simplistic design of not having a pentaprism and the fact that I can adopt many different lenses. The announcement of the EPL-1 caught my interest because of the image quality that I've seen in the review here and the price. After researching I also found the GF-1, my delimma is that they seem very similar but the Pana costs more.

If the GF-1 worth the extra $$$?

Thanks.