Nex 16mm. Should it have been 19mm or maybe 24mm?

Started May 19, 2010 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Flat view
Senior MemberPosts: 1,906Gear list
Nex 16mm. Should it have been 19mm or maybe 24mm?
May 19, 2010

I can understand they wanted a "pancake" or similar to keep the overall camera/lens size as small as possible to satisfy a certain sector of the market.

But really 24mm effective is pretty useless for a general walkabout lens. If it had been 19mm (28mm effective) that would have been much more useable, and only 3mm longer physically. Surely that would have been better?

f/2.8 isn't particularly fast, so the glass (and the overall dimensions) could still have been very compact if they had gone for a 19mm f/2.8 prime.

 Chippy99's gear list:Chippy99's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm F2.8 OIS Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow