Nonsense in D3S review conclusion.

Started Feb 16, 2010 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Senior MemberPosts: 1,063
Nonsense in D3S review conclusion.
Feb 16, 2010

Barnaby Britton wrote:

Conclusion - Pros: Unmatched image quality at high ISO settings. Incredibly efficient sensor. A new benchma rk.

Conclusion - Cons: Doesn't answer the main criticism of the D3 - 12MP was considered a fairly low resolution in 2007.

These things no not make sense at all. High ISO capabilities are closely related to lower resolution. If camera has good high ISO caopabilities THANKS TO lower resolution, and reviewer likes it, he cannot dislike the lower resolution in the same time.

It is logically inconsistent.

I also protest against "the main criticism of the D3 - 12MP was considered a fairly low resolution in 2007". I did not notice any mass complaining, and if someone missed high resolution camera, he now has D3x.

D3s is sports and reportage camera with welcomed practical high iso image quality, resolution is not priority of this camera. It makes no sense to complain that it does not have higher resolution.

For these two reasons I am asking the cons I mentioned to be removed.

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow