Forum indexCanon EOS-1D / 5D / 6D TalkChange forum

Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples

Started Jan 5, 2010 | Discussions thread

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Flat view

LarzL

Forum Member • Posts: 81

Like?

Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples

Jan 5, 2010

5 high ISO action samples taken at a soccer (futbol) scrimmage last night. All were shot raw and taken into LR 2.6. I removed any Sharpening, calrity adjustments and Noise Reduction. The shots are nothing special, I just wanted to show the "base" sharpness and noise of some high ISO images. There is one 6400, 2 12800, and 2 25600.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/larzl/sets/72157623145884198/

First impressions of the AI Servo focusing are good. I had no problems (except my hands were frozen) to speak of, and all the OOF images were my error. Tomorrow I will post sequences to show. Basketball tonight and more samples to capture.

Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Flat view

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	LarzL	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	PIXLVChad	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	f64manray	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	hicohen1	Jan 6, 2010
Blotchy chroma noise	cameraman12	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Blotchy chroma noise	shaktipalooza	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Blotchy chroma noise	LarzL	Jan 5, 2010
DPP better, but still blotchy	cameraman12	Jan 5, 2010
Canon Won the MP race !... and caught a severe psoriasis !!!	geo444	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Canon Won the MP race !... and caught a severe psoriasis !!!	Rich Dykmans	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Canon Won the MP race !... and caught a severe psoriasis !!!	ssj1	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Canon Won the MP race !... and caught a severe psoriasis !!!	Rich Dykmans	Jan 5, 2010
Canon Won the MP race !... and caught a severe psoriasis !!!	geo444	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO More samples added	LarzL	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO More samples added	Davero	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO More samples added	guitarist	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO More samples added	guitarist	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO More samples added	94	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO More samples added	sjprg	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Finer Noise	3D_Images	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Finer Noise	Davero	Jan 5, 2010
Funny thing is ....	JAM	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Funny thing is ....	geo444	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	didd	Jan 5, 2010
Well....	Cal Dawson	Jan 5, 2010
Horrible !	Dan Goldman	Jan 5, 2010
Hmmmm	JAM	Jan 5, 2010
yes most likely	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	zoooming	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	m5Drifter	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	m5Drifter	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	m5Drifter	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Horrible !	Scott Larson	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Well....	Faldo68	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Well.... I do have to say...	Cal Dawson	Jan 6, 2010
what the heck is "Futbul"???	jon lake	Jan 5, 2010
Not impressive	Carbonman	Jan 5, 2010
Did you try LR3? It is supposedly better than LR2.6.	photo nuts	Jan 5, 2010
Re: Did you try LR3? It is supposedly better than LR2.6.	ssj1	Jan 6, 2010
Thanks. Will look into the links later. :) /nt	photo nuts	Jan 6, 2010
You are right.	photo nuts	Jan 8, 2010
Re: You are right.	BMarc	Jan 8, 2010
Re: You are right.	photo nuts	Jan 8, 2010
Re: You are right.	BMarc	Jan 8, 2010
Oh I see	photo nuts	Jan 8, 2010
Re: You are right.	Scott Larson	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Did you try LR3? It is supposedly better than LR2.6.	Scott Larson	Jan 6, 2010
You are right. No difference in image quality. /nt	photo nuts	Jan 6, 2010
Thank You Very Much!	dtuason	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	Ramesh	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	LarzL	Jan 6, 2010
pretty poor results	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	David Pastern	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	guitarist	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	furano	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	David Pastern	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Vince Pea	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	David Pastern	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
some incorrect points	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: some incorrect points	Vince Pea	Jan 6, 2010
Re: some incorrect points (corrected) -_-"	Vince Pea	Jan 6, 2010
however..	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: however..	David Pastern	Jan 7, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	furano	Jan 6, 2010
dont mix camera classes	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: dont mix camera classes	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: dont mix camera classes	David Pastern	Jan 6, 2010
Re: dont mix camera classes	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: dont mix camera classes	David Pastern	Jan 7, 2010
yep, 720 is very good	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Vince Pea	Jan 6, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Vince Pea	Jan 7, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Rich Dykmans	Jan 7, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	David Pastern	Jan 7, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Vince Pea	Jan 7, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Scott Larson	Jan 7, 2010
Re: yep, 720 is very good	Vince Pea	Jan 8, 2010
Don't know about that...	Conan	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Don't know about that...	Vince Pea	Jan 7, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Cultured Vulture	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Cultured Vulture	Jan 7, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Rich Dykmans	Jan 7, 2010
Re: pretty poor results	Daveman1	Jan 6, 2010
you mean "real world samples"	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Underexposed????	gojones	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Cropped?	jbourbois	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Cropped?	LarzL	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Cropped?	John Storjohann	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Cropped?	LarzL	Jan 6, 2010
sorry, meant to reply to OP	jbourbois	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Underexposed????	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
To those who consider the results "horrible" ...	belfox	Jan 6, 2010
Re: To those who consider the results "horrible" ...	Scott Larson	Jan 6, 2010
Re: To those who consider the results "horrible" ...	Vince Pea	Jan 6, 2010
Re: To those who consider the results "horrible" ...	Scott Larson	Jan 6, 2010
yes, film is GRAIN, not ugly chroma noise	RedFox88	Jan 6, 2010
Re: To those who consider the results "horrible" ...	LarzL	Jan 6, 2010
were the shots brightened in post?	Dave Largent	Jan 6, 2010
Re: were the shots brightened in post?	LarzL	Jan 6, 2010
Reviews will look much better	maxz	Jan 6, 2010
Original Uncropped files have been added to set	LarzL	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Original Uncropped files have been added to set	Rat Salad	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Original Uncropped files have been added to set	Rich Dykmans	Jan 6, 2010
Re: Original Uncropped files have been added to set	Rat Salad	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Original Uncropped files have been added to set	Rich Dykmans	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Original Uncropped files have been added to set	Rat Salad	Jan 7, 2010
I found these samples of real world usage of higher ISO....	Howard Nusbaum	Jan 7, 2010
Re: I found these samples of real world usage of higher ISO....	Rich Dykmans	Jan 7, 2010
I'm sure your cell phone camera can do much better. /nt	photo nuts	Jan 7, 2010
Re: I'm sure your cell phone camera can do much better. /nt	Rat Salad	Jan 7, 2010
Why this sudden change in stance? ;) /nt	photo nuts	Jan 7, 2010
Maybe he just found bashing the 1DIV in the way that you did distasteful? nt	Vince Pea	Jan 7, 2010
Photonuts needs all the friends he can get! nt	Rich Dykmans	Jan 7, 2010
The D3s also suffers from BLOTCHY high ISO levels	photo nuts	Jan 8, 2010
they had NO NR!	bronxbombers	Jan 6, 2010
Curious...	photo nuts	Jan 7, 2010
Re: they had NO NR!	Rat Salad	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	joseph costa	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	mjbehnke	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	LarzL	Jan 7, 2010
a question to LarzL...	geo444	Jan 7, 2010
Re: a question to LarzL...	LarzL	Jan 7, 2010
Re: a question to LarzL...	Vince Pea	Jan 7, 2010
Re: a question to LarzL...	joseph costa	Jan 7, 2010
Re: a question to LarzL...	Vince Pea	Jan 8, 2010
Re: a question to LarzL...	geo444	Jan 8, 2010
Re: a question to LarzL...	Nill Toulme	Jan 8, 2010
They look decent for no noise reduction	Yaamon	Jan 7, 2010
Re: Final Thoughts from 1 persons photos...	mjbehnke	Jan 8, 2010
Re:Any sRAW1 samples	Johnny Novice	Jan 7, 2010
Re:Any sRAW1 samples	Palna	Jan 7, 2010
Picture does not show! n/t	Stepanfo	Jan 8, 2010
Re:Any sRAW1 samples	didd	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	Tizzio	Jan 8, 2010
Not so sure	photo nuts	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Not so sure	csnyder103	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	kuklukklak	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Mark 4 High ISO action photo samples	LarzL	Jan 8, 2010
Thanks for trying	Holscen	Jan 8, 2010
Re: Thanks for trying	LarzL	Jan 9, 2010
That's right	photo nuts	Jan 9, 2010
Re: That's right	LarzL	Jan 9, 2010

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	123
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	64
New rumour on SAR	60
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	60
If I owned an NEX-3 or NEX-5 variant, THIS is ...	55
Why 'Sony' not taken seriously?	49
Considering switching systems	46
$2000 mft Budget	42
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	41
GF6 gets DxOmarked	39
Excellent IQ from Fuji X : show me.	39
SL1: Urban wildlife up close	37
All Shots are soft 7D	36
post process this image	30
Why no more CCD sensors?	30
Purchasing opinion	30
Fuji X-E1 vs Canon 6d with 24-105 L	30
Next Pentax release (september) choose ONE option	29
OM-D E-M5 after 1 (one) year owner reports	28
RX100 Price Drop? When?	27