QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory

connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com

News ReviewsBuying GuideSample Images Articles Cameras Lenses Printers Software Forums Galleries Challenges

Forum indexNikon SLR Lens TalkChange forum

New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?

Started Dec 10, 2009 | Discussion thread

Parent

First

Previous

dave veneri

Senior Member • Posts: 2,051

Like?

New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?

Dec 10, 2009

Man, I thought id seen it all with an 85 3.5 macro coming out before the 85 1.4. This tops that....lol. Come on Nikon get a grip for God sakes, we all appreciate these updates but you need to update the older much more used primes FIRST!

Boy, I'd like to meet the guy who makes these decisions at Nikon, maybe that country had a "bailout" plan as well.....lol.

Peace, Dave

http://www.davenphoto.com

Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain

Parent

First

Previous

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	dave veneri	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	VRII	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Adman	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Alejandro Daz del Ro Fery	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Mr Fartleberry	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	rubicon	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	JC1306	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	eNo	Dec 10, 2009
Unless......	dave veneri	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	patrickhall	Dec 10, 2009
No 300F4 AF-S VR any time soon then?	M Katz	Dec 10, 2009
Re: No 300F4 AF-S VR any time soon then?	ovrebekk	Dec 11, 2009
Hey, Im not saying that the update is Bad	dave veneri	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	brunobarolo	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	eNo	Dec 10, 2009
I use the 300 2.8 and TC converters on the old lens	dave veneri	Dec 10, 2009
Re: I use the 300 2.8 and TC converters on the old lens	cajuncc	Dec 10, 2009
Re: I use the 300 2.8 and TC converters on the old lens	1995m	Dec 10, 2009
ROTFLOL - you made my day! Thanks. (nt)	heush	Dec 10, 2009
sorry Canon 4-5.6 my bad	dave veneri	Dec 10, 2009
Re: sorry Canon 4-5.6 my bad	rgmoore	Dec 10, 2009
Re: sorry Canon 4-5.6 my bad	martinch	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	gurbally	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	brunobarolo	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	patrickhall	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	stromaroma	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	DRode	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Cameranserai	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	John Fleming	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Raymond Bradlau	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Wanchese	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	George Collazo	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Raymond Bradlau	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	George Collazo	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Raymond Bradlau	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	lowlightSam	Dec 11, 2009
So many stridently voiced opinions...	Radley	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	SiPat	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	brunobarolo	Dec 10, 2009
Please restrain me...	1971_M5	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Phil Bishop	Dec 10, 2009
The New VR is supposed to be way better	Pongo828	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	rgmoore	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	JBakes	Dec 10, 2009
This release seems to be intended for the pros...	stratplaya	Dec 10, 2009
Adding new VR is not away from anything else (nt)	Kuvasauna	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	anotherMike	Dec 10, 2009
It's effective focal lenght @2.8 is only 200mm.	Starving Photographer	Dec 10, 2009
Re: It's effective focal lenght @2.8 is only 200mm.	Limecat	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	richard stern	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	binary_eye	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	Adman	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	JC1306	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	David Rosser	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	LarryK	Dec 10, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	ytteh	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	lowlightSam	Dec 11, 2009
wonder if they fixed the tripod foot n/t	Ravncat	Dec 11, 2009
It's a very minor update	SeanH	Dec 11, 2009
In time for Olympics	Stusteelhead	Dec 11, 2009
Re: New 300 2.8?? Is Nikon serious?	thomas2279	Dec 11, 2009
Time to stir the money making pot..	Geomaticsman	Dec 11, 2009

Parent

First

Previous

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

About us Write for us FAQ Feedback Interest-Based Ads Privacy Legal

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.

Mobile site