Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	MicekyVee	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	GazzaJagman	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	polloloco81	Sep 30, 2009
that doesn't make any sense	Bryan Campbell	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	MetzM	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	ScottD1964	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	peteb	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	Colin Smith1	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	tkbslc	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	ScottD1964	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	Sunny Kalsi	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	tkbslc	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	polloloco81	Sep 30, 2009
Except...	slydog	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Except...	peteb	Oct 2, 2009
Re: Except...	slydog	Oct 2, 2009
Re: Except...	peteb	Oct 2, 2009
Re: Except...	slydog	Oct 3, 2009
Designation, Quick recognition, etc.	MetzM	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Designation, Quick recognition, etc.	peteb	Oct 1, 2009
EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 does not match optical quality of L glass N/T	Reciprocal	Oct 1, 2009
Re: EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 does not match optical quality of L glass N/T	MetzM	Oct 1, 2009
Re: EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 does not match optical quality of L glass N/T	Luciano Morpurgo	Oct 1, 2009
Re: EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 does not match optical quality of L glass N/T	grammieb14	Oct 3, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	santa	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	jimr_1234567890	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	MicekyVee	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	peteb	Oct 1, 2009
It may not be feasible	Menges88	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	Joosay	Sep 30, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	Mike_13	Oct 1, 2009
I don't care about the 'L' designation...	Adrian Tung	Oct 1, 2009
Re: I don't care about the 'L' designation...	thaBuzzed	Oct 1, 2009
Re: I don't care about the 'L' designation...	travelinbri_74	Oct 2, 2009
Because cropped sensor is not serious	MICHAEL_61	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Because cropped sensor is not serious	Joosay	Oct 1, 2009
I thought 'L' stood for Luxury	g_r_w	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	Chez Wimpy	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	MicekyVee	Oct 1, 2009
The "L" designation is somewhat arbitrary	zerozeronine	Oct 1, 2009
Re: The "L" designation is somewhat arbitrary	polloloco81	Oct 1, 2009
You got it: you have a defective copy.	Paul De Bra	Oct 1, 2009
Re: You got it: you have a defective copy.	slydog	Oct 2, 2009
Not all L's have the same build quality.	Paul De Bra	Oct 2, 2009
Re: Not all L's have the same build quality.	Berc79	Oct 2, 2009
Re: The "L" designation is somewhat arbitrary	mmullen	Oct 3, 2009
Maybe a new "M" series?	VincentJ	Oct 1, 2009
Re: Ls category needed	chinch	Oct 2, 2009
Re: Ls category needed	Jun2	Oct 3, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	Jun2	Oct 3, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	comeon	Oct 3, 2009
Re: Why No EF-S 'L' Lenses	mmullen	Oct 3, 2009

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	105
Insensitive composition..	86
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	63
"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!	58
New rumour on SAR	57
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	51
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	48
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	47
e-p5 What's not to love	45
Considering switching systems	39
$2000 mft Budget	39
Lightzone is back and Open source!	38
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	36
D7100 - A few Great Blue Heron shots from Mud ...	36
Purchasing opinion	30
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	29
Which lens/ lenses to carry?	29
Excellent IQ from Fuji X : show me.	27
RX100 Price Drop? When?	26
Fuji X-E1 vs Canon 6d with 24-105 L	25