Forum indexFujifilm FinePix TalkChange forum

Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs

Started Aug 8, 2009 | Discussions thread

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Flat view

learning_photography

Regular Member • Posts: 229

Like?

Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs

Aug 8, 2009

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://www.digitalcamera.jp&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=ja&tl=en

ISO 1600:

ISO 3200:

Considering sensor size 1/2.4', it really can rival Fuji. ISO1600 and 3200 both have slight color de-saturation but the film grain type noise is almost the same like f200 SN mode kind of noise.

Have a look and comment!

Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Flat view

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	learning_photography	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	caissam	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	learning_photography	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	theranman	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	learning_photography	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	Eddaweaver	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	danny_only	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	NickPix	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Hi Nick....	danny_only	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	Altruisto	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	learning_photography	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	EXR	Aug 8, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	GaryP	Aug 8, 2009
as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	GaryP	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	EXR	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	theranman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	learning_photography	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	azumimm	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	theranman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	EXR	Aug 9, 2009
Re: as a comparison to F70 ... it remains very competitive ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37	learning_photography	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37 (better view)	learning_photography	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37 (better view)	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37 (better view)	GlennAC	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37 (better view)	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Agreed Kim , but	rolleiman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Agreed Kim , but	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37	TFD	Sep 23, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37	Raghu R	Sep 23, 2009
Re: Comparisons with G10, LX3, F200EXR and FX37	peter42y	Sep 24, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	limlh	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	metalized	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	metalized	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Sony WX1 Impressive ISOs	limlh	Aug 9, 2009
Personally ...	Lloydy	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Personally ...	GlennAC	Aug 9, 2009
Glen ...	Lloydy	Aug 10, 2009
$110?	kocho	Aug 11, 2009
$310 at Amazon, not $110. Sorry	GlennAC	Aug 11, 2009
I See No Directly Comparable Images To Validate The Accuracy Of That Definitive	jimr	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Personally ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Personally ...	GlennAC	Aug 9, 2009
Re: The TECH is important thing here.	Tianium	Aug 9, 2009
Re: The TECH is important thing here.	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Personally ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 9, 2009
Re: Personally ...	GlennAC	Aug 10, 2009
Kim...Your Postings Are Very Informative And Well Balanced! Thank You!	jimr	Aug 10, 2009
Cheers!	Billx08	Aug 10, 2009
Very impressive ...	David Chin	Aug 10, 2009
No HD video will hurt the F70 sales	Ngo	Aug 10, 2009
Re: No HD video will hurt the F70 sales	Kim Letkeman	Aug 10, 2009
TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
um ... you really are missing the point	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	karl boyle	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	ErwinWong	Aug 12, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	valkyrite	Aug 12, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 12, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 12, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 12, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	jacklai	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	jacklai	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	jacklai	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	MattRat	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
Add The Following To The Equation	jimr	Aug 11, 2009
exactly ... it's actually very scary for Fuji	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	John Carson	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	MattRat	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	NIK11	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	GaryP	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	NIK11	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	theranman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	EXR	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	NIK11	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	theranman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	karl boyle	Aug 12, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	azumimm	Aug 12, 2009
Replacement for F100	Mark K	Aug 12, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	karl boyle	Aug 12, 2009
Lowest ISO vague?	beneix	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Lowest ISO vague?	NIK11	Aug 11, 2009
Re: Kim - Latest WX1 samples at dc.watch.impress.jp	azumimm	Aug 11, 2009
Sony see, Sony do	Billx08	Aug 12, 2009
Re: Sony see, Sony do	theranman	Aug 12, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: TX1 hands on report ... compared to F200EXR	learning_photography	Aug 11, 2009
if these results are real ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
another question answered ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: another question answered ...	Ratracer	Aug 11, 2009
Re: another question answered ...	Kim Letkeman	Aug 11, 2009
Re: another question answered ...	MattRat	Aug 12, 2009
Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	Thomas Karlmann	Aug 12, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	Kim Letkeman	Aug 12, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	theranman	Aug 12, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	Kim Letkeman	Aug 13, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	learning_photography	Aug 13, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	peter42y	Aug 26, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	peter42y	Aug 26, 2009
Re: Are we forgetting how these night pix are taken?	apexi350z	Aug 26, 2009

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

10 reasons why a cell phone is better than a D800e	130
Creating a film look	118
Weekly X Series Photo Thread 16th June, 2013	83
Always expose for the sky?	66
The Weekly 4/3 DSLR Images 13 06 17	48
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	44
14mm kit lens, worth it or not?	41
Olympus alternative to Lumix 12-35???	40
Ruined nex	39
LF1 - Maximum Aperture at Various Focal Lengths	38
Unpredictable and fast-moving subjects ...	37
Any really good kit lens coming for the NEX ...	37
JPEG vs. RAW - An experiment	34
A good cat picture with the Olympus 17mm 1.8 ...	33
HELP!!! - Dust spots on my A77	32
Survey:	31
Share an image because of it's color	29
Harley Davidson 110th anniversary in Rome...	27
Tips for improving a B&W conversion	27
RX100; RX100M2 Different Sensors, M2 has ...	26