|
Canon lenses are much worse than Nikon's? Should I stop planning buying 5D II?
Dec 9, 2008
|
Hi folks,
first of all, I am a Canon user with my 10D and 70-200 IS f2.8 and other 3 lenses for 7 years. I believed that Canon is good and eventually it will leave Nikon far behind.
However, today I found this lens test web site:
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/overview
And according to the tests of it, both Nikon's 24-70 and 70-200 are far superior to those of Canon, in Vignetting, MTF resolution test, and Chromatic Aberrations.
Here are the links:
24-70:
Nikon
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/184-canon-ef-24-70mm-f28-usm-l-test-report--review
70-200
Nikon:
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/199-canon-ef-70-200mm-f28-usm-l-is-test-report--review
this result plus recent 5D II vs D700 tests really shook my desire of buying 5D II. Now I am considering to sell my Canon gears and jump boat. What do you guys think? Can you give me more confidence to Canon?
--
I am David Ho!
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 | |||
| Dec 9, 2008 |