Why I think the D3x is a relative bargain

Before I start I would like to pint out that I cannot afford this camera and it is far beyond what I need at present.

I have been pixel peeping today. I've looked at both Nikon's own samples and others from the web. So far every one I have looked at has blown me away and even the High ISO ones aren't too bad. As soon as the Nikon PRO mag arrived on my doorstep I was disappointed as I thought Nikon had just gone and shoved Sony's frankly rubbish sensor in a D3 and called it the D3x (in fact that is almost is what they did). The result though is frankly a miracle and I think this is one of the best DSLR's ever (D3 is still the best all rounder in my book). £5500 is about right for this level of equipment and the price will drop fairly quickly I think once the stock is readily available in stores. Granted there are some features missing from the camera that might have been nice but at the end of the day this will produce amazing images. It is no MF killer but does bridge the gap perfectly, besides does a 'blad have sensor cleaning, 1080P Video and all the other non essentials we seem to be crying about?
--
Norfolk (UK) based wedding photographer
http://www.davidthephotographer.co.uk