100-400mm or 70-200mm f2.8?

Started Jul 6, 2008 | Discussions thread
VanA
Regular MemberPosts: 307
Like?
I own both lenses
In reply to James A Bilello, Jul 8, 2008

However, I owned the 70-200 f2.8 IS for a few years before getting the 100-400 IS. During that time, I used a Canon 2x or 1.4x converter to handle the need for longer reach. I am using the 100-400 a bit more lately only because I mostly shoot wildlife outdoors. I was a bit skeptical of the push-pull design. But I have gotten used to it and haven't thought twice about it.

The 70-200 does an admirable job with the teleconverters. I do find that I need both lenses since I do shoot a fair share indoors or in low light (and occasional portraits) and that's when the f2.8 comes in handy. If you can swing it, get both lenses.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow