hoya vs B+W for UV Filters on 17-55 IS F2.8

Started Jun 5, 2008 | Discussions thread
Paul De Bra
Forum ProPosts: 11,310Gear list
Like?
But with a filter there is also a danger of damage.
In reply to Drew Conway, Jun 6, 2008

The example of the cracked 17-40L mostly shows that the hood of the 17-40L is too shallow and too wide to offer any meaningful protection. Most hoods are better.

I don't have the link handy but also read a report of a cracked filter damaging the front element of a lens.

I never use a UV filter and I always use the hood on all my lenses (except the 50mm f/1.8). I hope to never find out whether having a UV filter would have helped or harmed my lenses.

Drew Conway wrote:

Because even with the hood there is the potential to crack the front
element:

http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/

-- hide signature --

Slowly learning to use the 450D and and the Canon G6.
Public pictures at http://debra.zenfolio.com/ .

 Paul De Bra's gear list:Paul De Bra's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm 1:4.8-6.7 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow