Lightweight SLR. Cost vs quality vs weight ?

Started Apr 7, 2008 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPreviousNext
Flat view
harold1968
harold1968 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,687
Lightweight SLR. Cost vs quality vs weight ?

Ok, the candidates are (in weight order) [cost with kit lens]:

Sony a200 (572g) [£339]
Nikon D60 (522g) [VR - £422]
Canon 450D (519g) [IS - £529]
Olympus E410 (435g) [£279]
Olympus E510 (535g) [£369]

I am considering with kit lens and also possibly with Tamron 18-250mm (or Nikon/Olympus equivalent).

The Olympus is clearly the best in terms of size and weight. I am worried about the restricted dynamic range, but more importantly the lack of stabilisation. Which I think is a big omission for indoor shooting.

The Canon is clearly the most accomplished camera and best for ISO (early indications). It probably has the best IS kit lens. It is surprisingly light. However it is significantly more expensive.

I am tending towards the Sony as it seems to be the best price/weight/quality balance.

Any comments from anyone would be very welcome. Especially those that own one or more of these cameras.

thx

 harold1968's gear list:harold1968's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 Sony RX1R Olympus E-M1 Sony Alpha 7 Sony FE 35mm F2.8 +1 more
ForumParentFirstPreviousNext
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNext
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow