Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	Alex	Jan 26, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	IrishWildcat	Jan 26, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	Alex	Jan 26, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	HyperYagami	Feb 1, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	UK_Polarbear	Feb 2, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	David Markowitz	Feb 2, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	Alex	Feb 2, 2008
I am surprise nobody seem to notice this fact(nt)	Alex	Feb 1, 2008
As was mentioned,	misha	Feb 1, 2008
Re: As was mentioned,	Alex	Feb 1, 2008
No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	Ed Yamanaka	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	Bob Meyer	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	Alex	Feb 2, 2008
And one more thing	Alex	Feb 2, 2008
That's the point...	Ed Yamanaka	Feb 2, 2008
Re: That's the point...	Alex	Feb 2, 2008
Re: That's the point...	Woblee	Feb 5, 2008
Re: No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	ove2	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	misha	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	ove2	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No, it's the actual size of the buffer that counts...	Stregone	Feb 3, 2008
Re: As was mentioned,	ppage	Feb 2, 2008
Re: I am surprise nobody seem to notice this fact(nt)	slr_SoFL	Feb 2, 2008
Re: I am surprise nobody seem to notice this fact(nt)	Loz Green	Feb 4, 2008
write to buffer speed might be more important	Alain D	Feb 5, 2008
Re: I am surprise nobody seem to notice this fact(nt)	Alex	Feb 7, 2008
No body really care	landmarks4711	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No body really care	Alex	Feb 2, 2008
Re: No body really care	DMillier	Feb 2, 2008
Re: 450D has smaller RAW buffer than 400D	f22shift	Feb 1, 2008
Those useless extra bits...	Ehrik	Feb 2, 2008
Re: Those useless extra bits...	Alex	Feb 2, 2008
Re: Those useless extra bits...	Ehrik	Feb 2, 2008
Not really useless	dciobota	Feb 2, 2008
Most likely so	Ehrik	Feb 2, 2008
I disagree	dciobota	Feb 3, 2008
Re: I disagree	Ehrik	Feb 3, 2008
Re: I disagree	dreamwarrior	Feb 3, 2008
I don't think it's that cheap...	Ed Yamanaka	Feb 3, 2008
Re: I don't think it's that cheap...	Alex	Feb 3, 2008
i'm just happy its more than 350D	steve szenkovics	Feb 2, 2008

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 lens not so hot.	90
Did Nikon screw up?	81
OH MY GOD THE GX2 OH MY GOD	59
Micro Four Thirds body deflation	50
Firmware upgrade causes AF slow down on 18-55!	49
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	49
Leica Mini M	44
Does DPreview waste your time, too?	44
If the GX2 really had . . .	43
My first wedding with OMD	41
I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	41
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	37
When size matters (D800 pixel count)	36
Should I buy a NEX?	34
A few observations.	34
Leica entering m4/3?	29
GR and X100s side by side shots	29
<<<< Challenge 209: Results!!! >>>>	29
What might go wrong with GX2	26
Hassy's Lunar gets real	26