RAW files, a gimmick trick...?

Started Sep 28, 2007 | Discussions thread
Regular MemberPosts: 448
I laff when I read posts like yours, Humpy
In reply to Humphrey Nash, Oct 8, 2007

Humphrey Nash wrote:

For my applications and standards raw adds very little but always
requires much more work. Most “raw” adjustments are available for
jpgs. Most of my jpgs require no post processing.

You obviously don't print large, have any idea about making a digital
photo the best it can be and are content to be oblivious as to the
benefits of using the "digital negative" that RAW is.

Keep on Jpeg, dude.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow