Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Travis Feisthamel	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Michael Kaplan	Aug 23, 2007
WOW	chrswggl	Aug 23, 2007
Re: WOW	CptnJustc	Aug 23, 2007
Re: WOW	Jeff JC	Aug 23, 2007
nikon noise	maartenbreda	Aug 23, 2007
Re: nikon noise	Jola013	Aug 23, 2007
Re: nikon noise	andrew1306	Aug 23, 2007
It is CMOS	tinrobot	Aug 23, 2007
Specwise it surely looks good!	DaDane	Aug 23, 2007
It's also Sony's revolutionary new chip	AAK	Aug 23, 2007
Re: It's also Sony's revolutionary new chip	ohyva	Aug 23, 2007
Hehehe lifted directly from Sony marketing spiel :P (n/t)	warren prasek	Aug 24, 2007
Niion's previous LBCAST CMOS sensor was noisy as hell...	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
New Nikon - Pity me!	mister35mm	Aug 23, 2007
Re: nikon noise (D200 user)	Nikolai Samara	Aug 24, 2007
Re: WOW	Stollen123	Aug 23, 2007
lighten up	thang	Aug 23, 2007
Re: WOW	Jeff JC	Aug 23, 2007
Re: WOW	mjmurphy926	Aug 23, 2007
Um... gee.. maybe to actually evaluate SHARPNESS???	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
Other specs rock, but LCD spec misleading: it's VGA	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Really?? D300 LCD is actually only 300,000px? Bugger	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
Two questions	rdspear	Aug 23, 2007
May be it counting R+G+B, so real 311000 pixels (nt)	Safar	Aug 23, 2007
I'm sure you're right ... marketing at work	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Re: I'm sure you're right ... marketing at work	JortS29	Aug 23, 2007
Confirmed. Display is VGA (640 x 480) (nt)	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Oh dear so it's ONLY twice as good then [nt]	HappySnappy	Aug 23, 2007
Um, no, 640x480 = 307,000 vs 40D's 233,000.	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Um, no, 640x480 = 307,000 vs 40D's 233,000.	HappySnappy	Aug 23, 2007
Re:Ooops my error - 15%	HappySnappy	Aug 23, 2007
Re:Gawd my error - 34% better	HappySnappy	Aug 23, 2007
Just confirmed D300 LCD has double res of 40D	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
In 4 times at least in this case, but...	Safar	Aug 23, 2007
You'r should to rest... ;) (-)	Safar	Aug 23, 2007
Possible so	Safar	Aug 23, 2007
But it may be true...	Safar	Aug 23, 2007
Re: May be it counting R+G+B, so real 311000 pixels (nt)	HappySnappy	Aug 23, 2007
Re: May be it counting R+G+B, so real 311000 pixels (nt)	Safar	Aug 23, 2007
Re: WOW	John Seymour	Aug 23, 2007
Re: WOW	Travis Feisthamel	Aug 23, 2007
bad manners..	birdshot	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Travis Feisthamel	Aug 23, 2007
looks cool, but $500 more than 40D	birdshot	Aug 23, 2007
Re: looks cool, but $500 more than 40D	Marco C	Aug 23, 2007
$500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	marianco	Aug 23, 2007
Re: $500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	Ty5353	Aug 23, 2007
Re: $500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	Arash Hazeghi	Aug 23, 2007
Re: $500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	gml	Aug 23, 2007
Re: $500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	marianco	Aug 23, 2007
Really?	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Really?	AgentWD40	Aug 23, 2007
Re: $500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	gavin	Aug 23, 2007
Re: $500 is nothing for what you get. Nikon has finally blown away Canon.	gustabod	Aug 23, 2007
Nikon wifi flash	CJEP	Aug 24, 2007
200D Stays Available....Cheaper	subdoodle	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Wouldn't be surprised if IQ ..	digifan	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Wouldn't be surprised if IQ ..	HappyNewCanonUser	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Wouldn't be surprised if IQ ..	snackwells	Aug 23, 2007
Re: and $2800 less than the 1D MkIII nt	jdavis37	Aug 23, 2007
Re: and $2800 less than the 1D MkIII nt	Puma2	Aug 23, 2007
What Canon needs to do ........	notegra	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Ty5353	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Travis Feisthamel	Aug 23, 2007
Why the comparison with 40D?	mjmurphy926	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	Travis Feisthamel	Aug 23, 2007
Not so	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	bronxbombers	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	mjmurphy926	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	bronxbombers	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	takitimu	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	bronxbombers	Aug 23, 2007
They sure are going to sell a lot of battery grips!!!	saxe	Aug 23, 2007
Re: I'm guessing that will depend on the price of the grip	mjmurphy926	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Why the comparison with 40D?	thepaladin	Aug 23, 2007
The D200 looks to be the price competitor...	tinrobot	Aug 23, 2007
Impressive !	Jola013	Aug 23, 2007
I'll go Nikon today if i could!	ADAMBIKE	Aug 23, 2007
What am I missing?	JimH	Aug 23, 2007
check out the front page of dpreview.com n/t	Ty5353	Aug 23, 2007
Re: What am I missing?	CJEP	Aug 24, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	MariuszS	Aug 23, 2007
And the winner is?	Laslo Varadi	Aug 23, 2007
totally agree!	birdshot	Aug 23, 2007
Re: totally agree!	Brian Vallelunga	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	gml	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Me changing from 40D to D300	Plex	Aug 23, 2007
Imagine Ken Rockwell right now... (nt)	gumpy	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	PicMax	Aug 23, 2007
Anyone selling their L glass	coalcliff	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Anyone selling their L glass	FrenchAmerican0721	Aug 23, 2007
He wants to buy your Canon glass, not sell his ... (nt)	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Anyone selling their L glass	coalcliff	Aug 23, 2007
LOL, not just yet	Steve Russell	Aug 23, 2007
yes, sir, it replaces the D2x	thepaladin	Aug 23, 2007
Time to switch	thw	Aug 23, 2007
Nice Birthday Present for Me :)	marianco	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Torsten Koetting	Aug 23, 2007
It costs more and its MUCH heavier	harold1968	Aug 23, 2007
Re: It costs more and its MUCH heavier	Pusseapa	Aug 23, 2007
Re: It costs more and its MUCH heavier	harold1968	Aug 23, 2007
Also much higher res screen, better ergonomics, plus...	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
The screen spec is likely misleading	DRG	Aug 23, 2007
Re: The screen spec is likely misleading	JortS29	Aug 23, 2007
not better ergonomics!	DocDAT	Aug 23, 2007
I'm a canon user from way back, but open mind is required	warren prasek	Aug 24, 2007
Heavier?	misha	Aug 23, 2007
Correction	misha	Aug 23, 2007
Hmmm... Has this turned into the D300 forum?	carla_francisco	Aug 23, 2007
LOL - folk should concentrate on pictures, not small euipment differences (nt)	harold1968	Aug 23, 2007
No time for photos	dylanbarnhart	Aug 23, 2007
If you want to take photos, go to the lighting forum	marianco	Aug 23, 2007
Re: If you want to take photos, go to the lighting forum	harold1968	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Dan N	Aug 23, 2007
2nd post in 2 years?	dylanbarnhart	Aug 23, 2007
Re: 2nd post in 2 years?	Dan N	Aug 23, 2007
I'll wait until the dust settles	Fred Meehan1	Aug 23, 2007
Re: I'll wait until the dust settles	Steve Russell	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	PHOTOFORUM 1	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	John Seymour	Aug 23, 2007
they just turned the volume up to 11..1 louder nt	EJ Fudd	Aug 23, 2007
excuse me....	janneman02	Aug 23, 2007
as the 1ds Mark III	CJEP	Aug 24, 2007
D300 = Best 1.6 crop camera available ?	Richt2000	Aug 23, 2007
No!	macshark	Aug 23, 2007
LOL a Canon guy thinks all crops are 1.6 or 1.3	subdoodle	Aug 23, 2007
Thankyou captain nitpicker!	warren prasek	Aug 23, 2007
Specks on 40D and D300 are both good...lets wait for images & noise samples.	jonrobertp	Aug 23, 2007
LOL - a 70-post newbie spends his day nit picking	Richt2000	Aug 23, 2007
This reminds me of a baseball game played last night	Greenville	Aug 23, 2007
And the "winning" team players are paid 38% more cash? not a fair comparison at all	jonrobertp	Aug 23, 2007
I think it is - Top Semi pro vs Top Semi Pro	Greenville	Aug 23, 2007
Re: They will also look at the features	Rockchan	Aug 24, 2007
Re: They will also look at the features	AgentWD40	Aug 24, 2007
Seriously, dangerously out of touch	warren prasek	Aug 24, 2007
Re: Seriously, dangerously out of touch	hobbler	Aug 24, 2007
Re: Seriously, dangerously out of touch	AgentWD40	Aug 24, 2007
Re: Seriously, dangerously out of touch	Greenville	Aug 24, 2007
Re: Seriously, dangerously out of touch	harold1968	Aug 24, 2007
from a recent nikonian:	rhlpetrus	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Nikon D300 Offically Released....(nt)	Gary Collins	Aug 23, 2007
If not fair to compare, then it's even worse	Carl Lam	Aug 23, 2007
Measurbators!!!!!	coalcliff	Aug 23, 2007
Unbelievable spec	Parn	Aug 23, 2007
Re: Unbelievable spec	tf23	Aug 24, 2007
Re: Unbelievable spec	ConfuseUs	Aug 24, 2007
Canon should be ashamed	marianco	Aug 24, 2007
Complete nonsense (nt)	harold1968	Aug 24, 2007
My god, are you serious??? It's marketing who held stuff back! (nt)	warren prasek	Aug 24, 2007

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Insensitive composition..	86
Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	79
Leica M Monochrom vs DP2 Merril in a BW ...	64
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	56
New rumour on SAR	51
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	49
*Weekly Wildlife Thread: June 16 - 22*	48
Uninspiring performance of Nikon 105mm VR micro	43
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	39
e-p5 What's not to love	38
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	34
VF-4 is a Revelation	31
E5 shutter dies ... in the middle of shooting ...	30
$2000 mft Budget	30
Which lens/ lenses to carry?	29
"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!	28
Does anyone use X-pro 1 profesionally?	28
Lightzone is back and Open source!	27
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	27
FZ200 airshow #6: Panasonic TC, and ...	24