E900 vs F31fd in low light

Started May 14, 2007 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
David G O Smith
Regular MemberPosts: 193
Like?
E900 vs F31fd in low light
May 14, 2007

I am thinking of replacing my Kodak DX7440 which works fine but has very bad noise at ISO 400.

Am I better off with the E900 (which has RAW) or the F31fd (which has rave reviews for high ISO performance)?

I would prefer the option of RAW but it's the low light high ISO performance that counts. Face detection is not important to me, I think, although I have never used it.

Also, which has faster response, shot to shot, particularly with flash? I am asking JPG to JPG since presumably the E900 takes much longer to save to RAW.

Any assistance is much appreciated.

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow