17-55 is not all that ...

Started May 8, 2007 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
leolo
Regular MemberPosts: 206
Like?
17-55 is not all that ...
May 8, 2007

So I've had it for about a week, the infamous 17-55 mm 'beast' that is ...

I have read many slagging Ken Rockwell for under reviewing this lens, essential saying its not worth it, myself being a camera stores dream will buy it just because its more expensive, and so I finally decided to ignore Ken Rockwell and go with some of the others claims that its the one to have ...

Ok, its a nice lens, heavy!, but nice ... solid, the color is nice, but really, not much better then the 18-200... the 2.8 is a nice feature, and not for the low light aspect but for the shallow depth of field, but really I'm battling with whether to keep it. I think i may just return it and get the sb800 or 600 ... and something else … a cheaper lens maybe like the 105 micro or the 50mm 1.8.

-- hide signature --
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Not.New
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow