Am I wrong about what "full-frame" means?...

Started Dec 31, 2006 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Lee280zx2
Regular MemberPosts: 113
Like?
Am I wrong about what "full-frame" means?...
Dec 31, 2006

I'm reading a book called "A Short Course in Canon EOS 30D Photography" (by Dennis P. Curtin" to familiarize myself with my 30D.

I found the following statement in this book:

"The Canon 30D is one of the first affordable "full-frame" digital cameras that lets you draw from a vast array of interchangeable lenses."

I thought the 30D is not a full-frame camera because its sensor is not the size of 35mm film. I thought the 5D and 1D are full-frame digital cameras, but not the 30D.

In the same book it also says:

"The 30D (smaller frame) captures a smaller area than a camera using a full-frame sensor (larger frame)."

This statement seems to contradict the first and indicate that the 30D is not a full-frame camera.

Are there two definitions of "full-frame" that would let these two statements not be contradictory?

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow