
15 hours ago
|
EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM vs EF 28-105 F/3.5-4.5 II USM
Sep 28, 2006
|
Well, I've never owned an L or an IS lens, so maybe this is an apples and oranges thing.
The reviews I've read for the 28-105 look pretty good, and it's $1,000 CDN less than the 24-105. Has anyone here used both? TIA.
--
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canon Rebel XT / Nikon CoolPix 4500
EF-S 17-55/3.5 • EF 50/1.8 • EF 28/1.8 • Tamron 18-200/3.5 • Sigma 20/1.8
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 28, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 29, 2006 | |||
| Sep 30, 2006 |