17-35 2.8, 17-55 2.8, 28-70 2.8 not long enough

Started Sep 22, 2005 | Discussions thread
Cindy
Junior MemberPosts: 36Gear list
Like?
Re: 17-35 2.8, 17-55 2.8, 28-70 2.8 not long enough
In reply to BillyDix, Sep 23, 2005

I do have a D100, I plan to have the wide zoom on one and the tele zoom on the other. Anyone have that 50-135 mentioned yesterday, for sale?
Just as I am ready to go with 17--35 and 28-70, THE 17-55 POPS up again!

I am between the 2, 17-35 and 17-55. and I tell you I would just go with 17-55 and use my 105 2.5 (beautiful lens) but I want it all, I hate loosing the 55-100 range! I don't think I will ever stop using that 105!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow