|
Returned 20D, will stick with 300D
Mar 15, 2005
|
Just mailed it back. I have been comparing the 20D and 300D for the past ten days and really could not convince my heart that the improvement is worth another $1300.
Focus: in normal to bright light conditions, 20D and 300D are almost the same on 50/1.4 lens. 20D may be a bit faster, but 300D is fast enought. The advantage of 20D will show up at very dim light, but I seldom shoot under that circumstance.
Picture quality: amost no difference. the AWB of 20D is slightly better, but I shoot in raw, so it doesn't matter much.
Shutter sound: 20D is too loud. This attracts too much attention to me, which I do not deserve.
Continuous shooting: 20D is fantastic! But I mainly shoot portraits and scene, not sports.
In all, I feel I could not enjoy the improvements in 20D over 300D. My 20D's LCD is also a bit tilted. After thinking over night whether to return it or exchange for a new copy, I decide to send it back and use the extra money to buy a 580EX and a 85mm/1.8.
Hope I made a wise decision.
Thank you all for your inputs.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 16, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 16, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 15, 2005 | |||
| Mar 16, 2005 | |||
| Mar 16, 2005 | |||
| Mar 16, 2005 | |||
| Mar 16, 2005 |