~ S h e ~

Thank you very much

007peter wrote:
> I see, voted yourself 5 times with 5 different account. Here we go again :-( So sad

Indeed, here we go again. If anything is sad, it is amount of ignorance of this thread and the amount of suspicion directed toward this entry, or any entry that garners high votes (or low votes for that matter).

Perhaps the low and high scores should be disabled altogether. Make it a range from 2.0 to 3.5 stars instead. And automatically ban any member who has an entry where the votes are not a perfect normal distribution. There should never be any diverging opinions about a photo, there should always be somewhat of a consensus.

--
David
http://davidngo.zenfolio.com/

accuse of cheating? Are you replying to somebody else?

I only commented on the shot's aesthetics and my post was a compliment.

--
Raist3d (Photographer & Tools/Systems/Gui Games Developer)
Andreas Feininger (1906-1999) 'Photographers — idiots, of which there are
so many — say, “Oh, if only I had a Nikon or a Leica, I could make great
photographs.” That’s the dumbest thing I ever heard in my life. It’s
nothing but a matter of seeing, and thinking, and interest. That’s what
makes a good photograph.'

Seems to me to be a little rude to acuse cheating just because others liked the shot so much...Its horribily apealing...

Me too!

mschf wrote:
> Wanted to add, I didn't bother voting in this challenge but had I seen this entry, I'd have given it 5 stars.
> --
> ~ Martin

--
Have fun and improve your photography skills at http://www.fujimugs.com

That was my first reaction, but looking at kotec's other entries, there is no pattern at all. And, kotec has another 1st place. I came to the conclusion that this shots is just good enough (and clever enough for this challenge) to grab quite a few 5-star votes w/o padding.

The histogram is maybe a little suspicious, but certainly within the realm of possibility IMO.

Wanted to add, I didn't bother voting in this challenge but had I seen this entry, I'd have given it 5 stars.
--
~ Martin

it's miles better than the cookie cutter images occupying most of the rest of the entries and am personally amused that it won. Who's to say that 11 voters didn't appreciate a little "she" creativity actually?

007peter wrote:
> I see, voted yourself 5 times with 5 different account. Here we go again :-( So sad

--
~ Martin

Excellent photo and best example of inborn human vanity... with a sense of humor and a bit of self-sarcasm.
If I wasn't on vocation during voting, I would also vote 5 stars for it. Congratulations!

I like it very much.

I see, voted yourself 5 times with 5 different account. Here we go again :-( So sad

not one would say a normal distribution. Had a few friends help did we?

I love the textured of this photo, and it self it's very expresive.