Auroral photography: A guide to capturing the Northern Lights

If you've ever been interested in aurora photography, now is a great time to get out there and give it a try. Here's why:

  • The activity of our sun (the cause of aurorae here on Earth) ebbs and flows in eleven year cycles.  The peak of the current solar cycle - an apex of auroral activity - will occur around 2013.

  • Revolutionary improvements in imaging technology have been made since the last solar cycle. We have progressed from film to an age of digital image sensors which offer far greater sensitivity and resolution, along with real time feedback and less noise.

  • Our ability to predict the timing and intensity of aurorae has been enhanced considerably with the launch of the Solar & Heliospheric Observatory, the product of a collaboration between the European Space Agency and NASA. 

In the next few years we will enjoy sensational aurorae, advance notice of their arrival, and the equipment necessary to capture them as never before. Even armed with all of these advantages, however, the aurorae are not going to put themselves on your memory cards. That's something you'll have to do yourself, and it can be a struggle. 

This article provides ten suggestions that, if followed, will improve your odds of emerging from that struggle with some exceptional imagery. This article consists of two pages - the first page deals with how to find an aurora and equip yourself to capture it properly, and page 2 will guide you through the remainder of the process, including camera settings, composition and advanced topics.

1. Know Your Subject

Let’s begin by getting to know the aurora. According to my friend, astrophysicist Dr. Henry Throop, the aurora was thought at one time to be caused by ices suspended high above the Earth’s coldest, darkest regions. We now know that the aurora is actually an electrical phenomenon, caused by interactions between the solar wind and the Earth’s upper atmosphere. The sun emits massless photons that we see as light, but also emits out a real, physical, tangible wind of particles which moves at several hundred kilometers per second.

When this wind reaches the Earth, it begins a process that ends by exciting gasses in the Earth’s atmosphere, eventually leading to the emission of light. And just as a true neon light only comes in one color (red), the colors of the aurora are limited too: green and red caused by oxygen, with the fainter blue and purple caused by nitrogen. Unlike the wispy shapes of the aurora, its colors are narrow and precise.

Just like stars, the aurora is present during the day and the night, though during the day it is overwhelmed by the brightness of the sky. As the sun sets, it starts to become visible, being brightest near midnight when the orientation of the Earth’s magnetic field and the solar wind cause it to be strongest. The aurora is seen mostly in a ring centered roughly around the poles, where the solar wind is focused most intensely by the Earth’s magnetic field.

If the Earth had no magnetic field, we’d still have an aurora, but it would be weaker and more flat across the sky: a dull glow seen in every direction. A planet like Jupiter with a stronger magnetic field has a comparably more intense aurora, while Mercury - having neither an atmosphere nor magnetic field - has no aurora at all.

A terrestrial wind passing across the continents creates an unsettled display of turbulence and eddies, which we see in the form of dynamic cloud patterns, vortices, weather, and storms. In much the same way, the solar wind crossing the Earth’s magnetic field makes visible to us the turbulence of space: the vortices and eddies of magnetic fields peel off and pass rapidly overhead.

Even though - like wind - the magnetic fields themselves are invisible to us, we can see it through its tracers: charged particles. As the aurora moves in the sky overhead, the ripples in it are like the wakes and eddies peeling off a boat as at travels up a rough river at night, working at times with, at time against, the current and forcing what’s there out of the way.

2. Timing Is Everything

Now that you know what you’re chasing, when should you expect to actually see your quarry? Sadly there is no easy answer to that question. Here are some notes to consider, as you prepare for the hunt:

  • Aurorae are caused by Earth-directed coronal mass ejections. Those ejections often come from solar flares associated with sunspots, or originate from coronal holes on the sun. The sun rotates around into an Earth-facing position roughly every 27 days, meaning that at least on a short term basis there is an element of a 27 day cycle to geoeffective emissions.

  • There is an annual cycle that results in disproportionately high numbers of aurorae in the weeks on either side of the spring and fall equinoxes.

  • There is an 11-year solar cycle (the 'Schwabe cycle') during which the activity of the sun rises and falls. The number of sunspots tends to track this cycle, resulting in prevalent aurorae around the peak of this cycle. Oddly enough, though, coronal holes are most common about three years after the sunspot maximum, resulting in large numbers of aurorae also appearing about three years after the peak of the Schwabe cycle.

  • There are also much longer solar cycles stacked on top of these shorter ones, including cycles with periods of 22 years (the 'Hale cycle'), 87 years (the 'Gleissberg cycle'), 210 years (the 'Suess cycle') and 2,300 years (the 'Hallstatt cycle'). Most of us won’t be around for more than a few of these, though, so there is little sense letting them drive our planning.

  • The weather on Earth is another important factor. If the sky is cloudy, it doesn't matter what's going on above the cloud layer - you won't see it. In much of the arctic, the skies tend to be clearer in late winter and early spring than in fall.

  • Ambient light is another critical issue. In the high arctic, excessive sunlight will overwhelm any aurorae during summer and the surrounding months. The moon is another source of ambient light that must be considered. A partial moon may helpfully illuminate the surrounding countryside, avoiding the “silhouette” effect common in aurora photographs. I usually prefer about a quarter to a half of a moon when I’m including landscape in a photograph and want it to be illuminated. Anything approaching a full moon, however, can make it quite difficult even to see, much less photograph, ordinary aurorae.

Fortunately, the modern auroral photographer can take advantage of a lot of 'real time' information and analysis of so-called 'space weather', freely available online. Resources I recommend include:

  • The most informative space weather related information on the net, in my view is www.spaceweather.com.

  • An alternative presentation of similar information is available from the Space Weather Prediction Center.

  • Good short-term auroral predictions for Alaska are available on the University of Alaska website.

  • iPhone and iPad applications 'LightTrac' and 'Darkness,' which provide location-based data regarding sun and moon rise/set.

  • Further information on solar cycles is available on Wikipedia.

3. Location, Location, Location

Photographers in search of exceptional aurora imagery will generally need to travel a significant distance. This is because aurorae form in oval rings that, roughly speaking, circle the magnetic north pole (the 'aurora borealis') and magnetic south pole (the 'aurora australis').  When observed from far away, these rings will appear as a faint glow on the horizon. When viewed from the arctic or antarctic, however, even an ordinary aurora will often appear directly overhead.

Overhead aurorae tend to be more photogenic, clearer and brighter because of reduced atmospheric interference, and will more effectively illuminate the foreground. Auroral displays over snow, for instance, will generally cause the snow to take on the coloration of the aurora. In comparison, when an aurora is low on the horizon, the foreground will often appear as a less-interesting silhouette.

In addition to finding a location remote from the equator, you’ll want to situate yourself far away from city lights, airports, and other sources of light pollution. To give you a quantitative sense of what this means, when photographing around Fairbanks, Alaska (population under 100,000, counting the surrounding boroughs), I prefer to be at least 30 to 40 miles out of town. The farther, the better. Even from 100 miles into the bush, my photos will occasionally still show a faint orange glow on the horizon.
      
Here are a few popular spots:

  • Central and Northern Alaska: Relatively easy access from most of the United States, via Fairbanks. Hundreds of miles of beautiful mountain scenery, with year-round road access. The best locations, in my opinion, are along the Dalton Highway north of Coldfoot.

  • Iceland: Astoundingly beautiful landscapes abound, and unfrozen water suitable for reflections is abundant, even in winter. Frequently overcast, but still one of the world’s most wonderful countries to visit. However, travel from most places outside of Europe can be time-consuming, and staying in Iceland can be very costly.
                                                                                                           
  • Yellowknife, Canada: Well-situated in the auroral belt, but most photos from Yellowknife seem to feature flat fields of snow with pine forests. 

  • Greenland: At the time of writing Greenland is quite difficult to reach directly from the United States or most other countries, unless you’re a world-class swimmer. There's no road system, but Greenland is a superb place to snowshoe around in the dark, searching for aurorae. Greenland isn't for the faint of heart though - think twice before wandering around in the dark, searching for aurorae in a land filled with polar bears. 

  • Tromsø, Norway: A very long trip from North America, not even counting the time required to find the 'ø' on your computer when booking the flight. This location offers picturesque mountains and water in which auroral reflections regularly appear, but you might struggle to completely exclude the glow of town and city lights from your photographs. 

  • Antarctica: Exotic, and one of few locations where one can photograph the aurora while huddling for warmth with a colony of emperor penguins. Unfortunately, unless you’re a scientist overwintering at a research station, it’s virtually impossible to access the continent when aurora are most prevalent.

As I’m based on the west coast of the United States, northern Alaska has become my preferred location for aurora photography.

4. Gear Up For Battle

When photographers are asked how they managed to achieve a certain result, they will usually point to their own artistic proficiency, not the capability of their tools. 'It’s the photographer, not the camera,' is the common refrain. There are, of course, elements of artistry in aurora photography as well. However, the importance of good quality equipment cannot be overstated. Aurora photography does not require the most expensive kit available; it requires gear that can capture broad views, in low light, in cold weather. You will need:

  • A camera body that excels with clean high-ISO operation. There are a number of new bodies in recent years that meet these criteria well, and which have enabled revolutionary advances in the field of aurora photography. Weather-sealing is a definite plus, although not a necessity.

  • A wide, fast lens. On a full frame camera, a focal length of 24mm or less is desirable – but the wider, the better, in my experience. Ideally the lens will be able to shoot sharp pictures with minimal vignetting at a maximum aperture of f 2.8 or less, as you’ll want to keep your exposures short. All else being equal, your exposure will be inversely proportional to the square of your aperture, meaning that a lens at f 2.8 will need four times as long to capture an image as at f 1.4. Currently, my favorite lens for this purpose is Nikon’s AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f 2.8G ED.

  • A sturdy tripod, and a remote shutter release (or, at a pinch, your camera's self-timer function). Don’t bother leaving home without them. They’re essential for aurora photography. A robust ballhead is also extremely useful.

Gearing up for winter photography, at night, in the arctic, necessitates psychological preparation as well. If you want to get the most out of your journey, you’ll need to be prepared to be awake and working most of the night.

5. Brace Yourself For A Chilly Reception

Aurorae just don’t seem to enjoy the warmth of the tropics or the glow of the midnight sun during summer.  You’ll need to play on their home turf, during the dark months. That means planning to spend hours on end, standing around outside at night, quite possibly in extreme cold, and probably a long way from home.

Clothing: be sure you’re dressed for the occasion. This is not a party you’ll want to attend in a mini-skirt.  For winter aurora photography I’ve settled on a down-filled mountaineering suit (the Mountain Hardwear Absolute Zero), winter boots rated to -40 degrees F (the Sorel Caribou Reserve), multiple pairs of long thermal underwear (Under Armour ColdGear Base 3.0, both top and bottom), and a wind-proof cap (by Mountain Hardwear).

For the hands, you’ll want gloves thick enough to keep you warm, but thin enough to allow you to operate your camera. Personally I prefer to forgo gloves and keep my hands in warm pockets between shots. Most of the time it works fine. If you’re averse to occasional frostbite, try a different approach.

Batteries: The temperatures of the far north take an enormous toll on battery life. My camera batteries last around 1,500 actuations in normal conditions, but in the arctic winter have become exhausted after as few as 25 frames. The conventional cold weather advice is to keep your battery warm by storing it in a jacket pocket while not in use, but that is not an adequate solution under extreme arctic conditions. I recommend bringing multiple batteries and a charger, and rotating the batteries through the charging station when they’re not in use. If your aurora photography will take you far from the nearest well-stocked camera store, consider also bringing backups for any other 'mission critical' elements of your system.

Tripods: Carbon fiber tripods are just wonderful. They’re light, and in cold weather can be carried without chilling your hands as much as metal would. In frigid temperatures, however, both the carbon fiber legs and the adhesive used to connect then to your tripod base can become brittle. Exerting substantial pressure on your tripod, particularly when its legs are buried in deep snow, can easily result in the amputation of a leg. If you’d prefer not to find yourself hundreds of miles from civilization, with only a 'dipod' for support, be particularly cautious when planting your gear in deep snow.

Cameras and lenses: As noted above, weather-sealing is preferable. In part, this is to help prevent condensation from forming inside your equipment, when you move from an exceptionally cold environment (e.g., shooting outside) to a much warmer space (e.g., into a heated car). Particularly for non-weather-sealed equipment, including most medium format cameras and lenses, it is essential that the cold-to-warm transition be made gradually. It only takes one misstep to generate trip-ending amounts of condensation inside your lenses or sensor. To help slow the transition, I transfer my equipment to a camera bag that has also been outside, and only after sealing the bag do I move the bag and its contents into a warmer space. The camera is then allowed to heat up, slowly and safely, within the bag. For even better protection, consider placing your equipment in an airtight enclosure, such as a Ziploc bag, during the thawing process.

Safety gear: If you’re headed to the far north during winter you should, of course, also read up on how to travel safely in cold, icy climates. When travelling in northern Alaska between November and March, I’ll usually bring extra fuel, chemical additives to prevent the fuel from freezing, an oversupply of food (including food that will be palatable when frozen), a cold weather sleeping bag (rated to -25 degrees F), jumper cables and a tow rope with which a vehicle could be rescued after sliding off of an icy road. My tow rope has paid for itself on multiple occasions.

43
Flag as inappropriate
12

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by dpreview.com or any affiliated companies.

Share:
Print view

Comments

Total comments: 82
12
Ben Hattenbach
By Ben Hattenbach (Oct 12, 2011)

Hi Folks. Thanks very much for all the positive feedback. It will help keep me warm on my next photoshoot. Poul, with respect to your comment on the science, the scientific portion of the article (Section 1) was provided by a Ph.D. astrophysicist who, as a professor and researcher, has studied aurorae not only on earth but on other planets. It was intended to be understandable by lay people, not a comprehensive dissertation; nonetheless, I believe (and sure hope) it is entierly accurate from a scientific perspective.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
Poul Jensen
By Poul Jensen (Oct 13, 2011)

You did well then, but I would have some arguments with the astrophysicist (Henry Throop I take it) who authored your Section 1 and 2. That discussion doesn't belong here, but I would like to point out that when you are watching the aurora, you are not seeing "focused solar wind" or turbulence created by the solar wind blowing by the magnetosphere as you might think from this article. You are watching processes internal to Earth's magnetosphere (though, ultimately the energy fueling these processes does come from the solar wind).

1 upvote
JPnyc
By JPnyc (Oct 12, 2011)

Thank you!
Other than that, I am at a loss for words ...

0 upvotes
Poul Jensen
By Poul Jensen (Oct 12, 2011)

While there is plenty of good info/advice for aspiring aurora photographers, the author is not on top of the science behind the aurora and would have done well to have the article revised by someone who is. But then, while the article wouldn't pass a scientific review, the details that are off are practically irrelevant since this is a photography and not a science forum...

0 upvotes
anolphart
By anolphart (Oct 12, 2011)

I take my hat off to you guys.

Whilst I have skied and camped extensively in the back country in mid winter, the Australian Snowy Mountains temperature rarely gets below -20C (-4F). Relative to what you guys experience, our coldest is what you would consider a heat wave.

1 upvote
Dianoda
By Dianoda (Oct 12, 2011)

Thanks for the excellent article. Good tips on the winter mountaineering gear and batteries.

Good timing, too, as I'm in the early stages of planning an ice-climbing trip to Canada (to Jasper, Alberta, or perhaps Banff) to welcome the new year, and the chance to photograph the aurora is a big plus to me. Hopefully aurora activity will be significant. Can anyone from the Jasper/Banff area offer comment on local aurora watching? Thanks in advance!

Sounds like I'll also want to bring along the double plastic boots and some serious down to keep me functioning in the frigid nighttime winter conditions. Fun stuff! Planning to bring my 7D and renting a 24mm f/1.4 (with damage waiver), and I'm pretty sure my Manfrotto 190cxpro3 is up to the task. And snow shoes for the tripod might be worth it...

0 upvotes
Road Lice
By Road Lice (Oct 12, 2011)

Dianoda, Banff is quite far south and has lots of light pollution. You can see northern lights fairly often in Jasper but they are nothing like Ben's pictures (which are the most astounding northern lights pictures I have seen). The best foreground location for northern lights is halfway between Banff and Jasper in the Sunwapta Pass - which can be a dangerous drive in winter and also very cold, like -40.

Like Ben says you have to go much further north for the better northern lights. Yellowknife is much better than Jasper. The Dalton Highway (see the above photo) and the Dempster Highway are even more awesome. Both of those highways involve extreme conditions, especially the Dempster Highway.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
1 upvote
spokelse
By spokelse (Oct 12, 2011)

Lived in Tromso for many years, its actually pretty easy to get away from the lights, I didn't do Aurora photography but I knew people who did. And to be clear, the most amazing thing about Norlys is the movement, although Ben captured some great images. Also, weirdly, its almost like you can hear the aurora, can't be true, but people comment on this.

2 upvotes
Identity
By Identity (Oct 12, 2011)

Although I don't see myself in a position to capture shots like this any time soon, this was a really informative article and I quite enjoyed it. This is so different from the usual around-the-house, casual hiking, and street photography that I do. It's just you, the darkness, the cold, the silence, and plenty of time to ponder things. Sounds great.

0 upvotes
taotoo
By taotoo (Oct 12, 2011)

More of these types of articles please DPReview! Note how a high quality article = high quality comments and no bitching.

2 upvotes
Barney Britton
By Barney Britton (Oct 12, 2011)

Careful - don't jinx it! :)

1 upvote
Identity
By Identity (Oct 12, 2011)

This article didn't even mention using a point-n-shoot camera for this type of work. How is my wife supposed to know how to take shots like these with her pink Nikon Coolpix? What a lame article! :)

2 upvotes
taotoo
By taotoo (Oct 12, 2011)

This must be about the first article without a URL at the end. Perhaps community-authored rather than commercial articles are the way forward?

0 upvotes
Lars Rehm
By Lars Rehm (Oct 12, 2011)

Sorry to disappoint but if you flip to page 2 you'll find the author's URL at the end of the article ;-)

1 upvote
taotoo
By taotoo (Oct 12, 2011)

Didn't realise there was a page 2! Maybe all those other articles were more in-depth than I thought! Either way this article sets a new benchmark.

1 upvote
NikonD3sUser
By NikonD3sUser (Nov 17, 2011)

http://www.photopark.ca/Fun/Aurora-2011/19724169_8sKvsV#1549941004_wkgJVNz

0 upvotes
Jorginho
By Jorginho (Oct 12, 2011)

Great info!
Some additional information. Spaceweather indicates "storm levels" from 0 (nothing is going on to) a Kp-index of 9 (severe). In The Netherlands and England for instance, but also the middle part of the eastern US Aurora may be seen from a Kp index of 6 (weak!), certainly you will have more than 50% chance with 7. It will be great at 8 and I have witnessed aurora to the south of me, not north, with a Kp of 9. I live at 52 degrees in very light polluted Netherlands...Aurora with Kp of 8 and 9 are magnificent, breathtaking in beauty over here and I personally prefer them over the green, fast moving ones near the artic circle for they are green+ red and sometimes purple and slower moving
You will see streamers (gigantic beams) glowing up in one minute and then dimming over the next 5 minutes or so. If you are lucky. If you live at 40-45 degrees in the US and 48-55 in Europe the next three for years you'll see them. I have already seen them and pictured them this cycle...

3 upvotes
KodiakCruiser
By KodiakCruiser (Oct 12, 2011)

A very comprehensive article indeed. Extensive and just about correct all around, but I do absolutely recommend not to set your lens to infinity without rigorous testing to see if it turns out sharp. With a big aperture, as you definitely need when shooting northern lights, the margin is very narrow. You will most likely get pictures which are slightly out of focus. And you won't see that until you get back home and view them on a bigger screen. Annoying...

I've been shooting auroras in Tromsoe for many years as this is my home. Yes, lucky me:). And I can also say that you only have to drive for about 20 minutes to be in complete darkness - without any light pollution of any kind. Open water all around with great reflections as the ocean and the fjords never freeze up. This region is excellent for northern lights shooting. Let me know if any of you are planning a trip to Tromsoe.

Shots can be viewed at my website www.kodiak.no. Just to get a taste of it

Anyway - great article!!

4 upvotes
stanic042
By stanic042 (Oct 12, 2011)

I am planning to visit Tromso next winter, hopefully the weather is going to be ok :)

0 upvotes
windmillgolfer
By windmillgolfer (Oct 13, 2011)

Excellent article, with much practical advice. Many thanks to DPR and he author. Understandably, it is oriented to those who are US-based. Being UK-based, Tromsoe looks like the nearest place with the highest probability of a result but still a long way to go and with no certainty of success. I'm aware that the Aurora can be seen from Northern Scotland. So, it looks like an expedition in early 2012 is in order, a learning curve, for a potential early 2013 Tromsoe trip - may have to book early. Any Alaskan attempt would probably be best met through a cruise. Either way, a fascinating subject; something of a Holy Grail for photographers and, for my wife, something she would very much just like to see. A Bucket List item for sure.

2 upvotes
rudymnv
By rudymnv (Oct 12, 2011)

Great article, very informative, thank you.

0 upvotes
Henrik Herranen
By Henrik Herranen (Oct 12, 2011)

Comprehensive article that covers everything from clothing to exposure times. Kudos to the writer who obviously knows what he is writing about.

Two comments:
1) Last month I bought Samyang's 14mm f/2.8, mainly for future aurora shots. After some testing, I can wholeheartedly recommend this lens as a really wide and inexpensive full frame solution. The image quality is just great, even at f/2.8.
2) For my hands I use ice fisher's thermo gloves that are very much like this link I found:
http://www.eralle.fi/fi/Kalastus/Vaatetus/79/ASTRO-THERMO+hanskat+L/2812
I recommend this kind of handwear highly.

0 upvotes
Dapple 101
By Dapple 101 (Oct 12, 2011)

Excellent article - as informative as it is inspiring. Thanks.

0 upvotes
stoneage
By stoneage (Oct 12, 2011)

Nice shots!

Those who want more inspiration should take a look at these beautiful time laps movies (run then in full screen):

http://vimeo.com/21419634
http://vimeo.com/21294655

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
4 upvotes
Card
By Card (Oct 12, 2011)

Fantastic article. Easily the best I've read on this subject.

5 upvotes
Total comments: 82
12