Auroral photography: A guide to capturing the Northern Lights

6. Master Your Camera Settings

The aurora can move quickly across the sky, appearing and vanishing, twisting and turning like a cloud of neon smoke. Once you are properly outfitted and have found an aurora, it isn't actually particularly hard to capture it.  However, you’ll be doing so in the dark, probably in extreme cold, and may have only a minute or two to get it right - so practice with the proper settings is of paramount importance. Basic preparatory steps include:

  • Shoot in a Raw file format. You’ve probably gone through a lot of effort to get where you are. Raw capture will allow greater flexibility in resurrecting improperly exposed frames and will ensure that you return home with maximum image quality.

  • Lower your LCD brightness, helping to preserve your night vision. If your camera has live view, turn it off as well, to prevent stray light from being recorded.

  • Remove any filters, protective or otherwise, from your lens. Otherwise, optical interference fringes caused by the interaction of filters with light from the aurora may introduce serious abnormalities into your images. These gremlins usually appear as a series of faint concentric rings.
                                                                                                                       
  • Select the largest lens aperture that will give you a reasonably sharp image. With an active aurora, stopping down in an effort to improve sharpness is often counterproductive. Because the aurora is constantly in motion, longer exposures will capture more of a broad green mist than the detailed structure of the aurora at any particular point in time. Longer exposures will result in increasingly noticeable star trails as well, as the Earth will be slowly rotating relative to the stars throughout your exposure.

  • Choose the highest ISO at which your camera will provide reasonably good quality output. Experiment with noise reduction both in-camera (see the discussion of darkframe subtraction below) and in post-processing. Also, take into account the size of any prints you may desire to make.

  • Focus your lens at infinity. You will need to do this manually, since it is highly unlikely that your camera will be able to lock focus onto aurora. If you are setting up your shot in daylight, set focus on the most distant object or scene element that you can see. If you're working at night, set the focus ring of your lens to the infinity symbol.

    If your lens is one of the sort which can be focussed beyond the infinity sign on its focussing scale, and you don't have the luxury of having set focus manually in daylight, you will have to establish accurate focus by experiment. Once you have established correct infinity focus, consider taping your focusing ring so it does not inadvertently shift in the dark. Even a slight shift in focus, while using a wide aperture, can render your images worthless.

  • Put your camera into manual exposure mode. Set your aperture wide, to as low of an f/stop as will give you sharp results with your lens. Set as short an exposure time as possible, and ideally well under 30 seconds. Shooting with an aperture of f/2.8 at ISO 800, I typically use exposure times around 4 to 15 seconds, although the duration varies with the intensity of the aurora and artistic preferences.

  • While working with your camera in cold conditions, be careful not to breathe on any surface where you do not want ice crystals to form. This includes, most commonly, lenses and viewfinders.

7. Long-exposure noise reduction (dark frame reduction)

Long exposures, particularly at high ISO sensitivity settings will result in the capture of unwanted 'fixed-pattern noise'. To combat this, most high-end compact and DSLR cameras have a function known as dark-frame subtraction. Very simply, dark-frame subtraction works by comparing your exposure with one of equal length, but taken the camera's shutter closed. This second 'dark' exposure is taken immediately after the main exposure. Any noise which is visible in the 'dark' frame is then subtracted from the captured image. 

You can also perform dark frame subtraction after the fact, in Photoshop. Take your own 'dark frame' by covering your lens, then in Photoshop, lay the dark frame over the original image, and align the two. Next, select the dark frame layer and change the blending mode to 'difference' and season to taste by adjusting its opacity.

8. Make Photographs, Not Snapshots

Seeing an aurora for the first time can be an emotional experience. The Aurora is a mesmerizing creature. You will likely remain in awe long after seeing dozens of them. Nevertheless, if your goal is to create memorable photographs, you’ll need to maintain your composure. Resist the urge to indiscriminately snap photos of anything that is green and moving, or to zoom in on an aurora while excluding its surroundings.

Think in advance about how you would normally compose a compelling landscape photograph, sans aurora.  Most of us would search for elements of interest in both the foreground and background - perhaps patterns in the snow, a pile of rocks, a grove of trees or a mountain, giving clues as to scale and orientation. We would look for leading lines - some structure to guide a viewer’s eye through the scene, and so on. Do not hurl these landscape basics out the window the moment you first glimpse an aurora. Keep them in the forefront of your mind, find a scene that would be worth photographing without an aurora, and then add an aurora to it. 

9. Seize The Opportunity

If you have the good fortune to encounter a particularly colorful, intense or fast-moving aurora, it may last several hours but will more frequently last just a few minutes.  Either way, you’ll never know until the opportunity has passed. My most recent aurora-hunting expedition lasted over a week, but the vast majority of my 'keepers' were captured during a single period that lasted less than ten minutes.

If the opportunity arises, find a suitable composition, fire away, and sort out the good ones later.

10. Practice Makes Perfect

if you want to become a successful aurora photographer, practice is essential. Remember that the speed and intensity of aurorae often change rapidly, so that settings that work well at one moment may not the next. Become accustomed to checking your histograms on-the-fly, and adjusting your exposures accordingly. In addition, review your results in greater detail each day on a laptop computer, and use that process as opportunity to further optimize your settings, to fine-tune your compositions, and to look for any obvious errors you’d prefer not to replicate throughout your entire journey.

Once you have mastered the basics, a variety of advanced topics will remain to be conquered, including:

  • Light painting: try illuminating your foreground with a hand-held light source. In selecting a light source, pay careful attention to its color. Current LED flashlights, for instance, are highly efficient but commonly impart a bluish color cast. Incandescent bulbs will often be more suitable.

  • Time lapse photography: An aurora slowly dancing across the sky is an excellent subject for time lapse movies. Many modern cameras include not only HD video capability, but a built-in intervalvometer enabling high resolution still photographs to be captured automatically at regular intervals. Experiment with stitching still images of an aurora into a motion picture.

  • Foregrounds: Round out your portfolio with a diversity of foregrounds. Include mountains, paths, snow-covered trees, an occasional moon, reflections in a lake or river, people, a tent or log cabin dimly lit from the inside, and even a slight glow from a rising or setting sun. And don’t forget to occasionally look above; images of an auroral corona often taken straight up and without any foreground, can be stunning as well.

  • Color: Once you’ve had your fill of the usual green aurorae, you’re just getting started. Hunt for red, violet, purple and blue.

  • Rorschach-ery: Have you ever searched for animal shapes in clouds, or taken a 'Rorschach' test in which you've been asked for your perception of an inkblot? Similar fun can be had with arourae. Anyone see a bird of prey, or perhaps a pterodactyl, in the photograph immediately above section 6 of this article?

  • Post-production: become familiar with high quality approaches to noise reduction in post-processing, and how to manually adjust the color temperature and tint of your Raw files to match the scene you witnessed.

The time has now arrived for you to put these lessons to use. Enjoy your journey, and best of luck in capturing one of Earth’s greatest spectacles.


Ben is an avid adventurer, conservationist, and wilderness photographer who enjoys exploring remote corners of our planet. Among his favorite subjects are desolate arctic landscapes and the wildlife that inhabits them.  More of his images of the aurora, and other subjects, can be seen at www.benhattenbach.com.

40
Flag as inappropriate
12

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by dpreview.com or any affiliated companies.

Share:
Print view

Comments

Total comments: 79
12
spiritualized67
By spiritualized67 (4 months ago)

One of the most thorough Aurora articles I've read. Nicely done. Hope to plan a trip in 2013.

0 upvotes
Alpha sniper
By Alpha sniper (4 months ago)

and you need to take with a small flash light, preferable one of those that you can wind up, i found that it worked well when i photographed the AB in Saariselka Finland

0 upvotes
Smufter
By Smufter (4 months ago)

I am off to Lapland in about 6 weeks time in search of the Northern Lights. I know it is pure chance if we manage to see them but it would be superb if we did. I have been practicing my "manual mode" skills and have just purchased a 14mm lens to attach to my E-PL1 in the hope of catching some decent enough pics. Great article and some really good tips. Thanks.

0 upvotes
Nickitaco
By Nickitaco (5 months ago)

Thanks for a very informative and enjoyable read. I live in Southern Ontario and travel to see family across Nrothern Ontario where I have had the good fortune to see the Aurora Borialis many times. I have never thuoght about photographing them, I will be sure to give it a go. Your landscape tips look like good advise. Oddly enought the times I have seen them have always been during the summer months, although judging from your pictures they look to be more intense than any I have seen in July.

Thanks again.

0 upvotes
Earthlight
By Earthlight (6 months ago)

Thanks for the nice article. If only all Dpreview articles were of this quality.

I do quite a bit of celestial photography here in high latitudes and my recommendation is an aluminum tripod with foam covered legs. I also refuse to leave home without a thermos flask full of hot drink.

1 upvote
NikonD3sUser
By NikonD3sUser (6 months ago)

http://www.photopark.ca/Fun/Aurora-2011/19724169_8sKvsV#1549941004_wkgJVNz

0 upvotes
Umbris
By Umbris (6 months ago)

Thanks for the very informative article and inspiring photos. I plan to travel to Fairbanks, Alaska in March of next year to try to capture some of my own Aurora shots. I really look forward to skies without light pollution also. Something I haven't seen since I was a child, living on a farm in central Washington (state).

0 upvotes
Maraya
By Maraya (6 months ago)

http://vimeo.com/21419634
Here is an excellent video of aurora in Norway

0 upvotes
DanCee
By DanCee (6 months ago)

Very good article and detailed. Thanks for sharing!

0 upvotes
fdxx
By fdxx (7 months ago)

Very good article,
thanks for sharing your experience and expertise.

0 upvotes
gvtran
By gvtran (7 months ago)

Excellent article! very education. Thanks

0 upvotes
photographynamkhanh
By photographynamkhanh (7 months ago)

đẹp quá.

0 upvotes
Jan Privat
By Jan Privat (7 months ago)

Very good article! Do you offer aurora shooting trips? ;-)

0 upvotes
PixLvr_Sanan
By PixLvr_Sanan (7 months ago)

Hello Ben,
I was wondering if you could provide us with details on "Astral photography" too.
Also, though this article sounds great, but I think I won't be able to actually execute it since I'm based in India, and there's no info. about my country herein, as to examples of favourable places.
Yes, I can Google it up, but obviously, I won't regard that as authentic; and though I get the idea to travel farther away from the city lights, I want to know, whether these (or astral) photography can be effectively captured from the terrace of our homes (Yea, I know that it wouldn't be a great idea, but my parents won't let me go anywhere just like that, and that too, for PHOTOGRAPHY !)
Anyways, waiting for your reply :))
AWESOME article, once again, and Thanks whole LOADS :))))

0 upvotes
Golferbetrue
By Golferbetrue (7 months ago)

Great to share with every photographer who appreciates space/ nature photography! Best of Wishes always!

0 upvotes
KaiserAng
By KaiserAng (7 months ago)

An excellent read, I must say this is the kind of article I've been looking for for a long time.

1 upvote
ChipTz
By ChipTz (7 months ago)

Excellent article, the best I read here so far!

0 upvotes
Ben Hattenbach
By Ben Hattenbach (7 months ago)

Boorrris- you raise a good question about the 24 f/1.4. I have both that lens and the 14-24, but strongly prefer the 14-24 when I'm in a location with arourae regularly appearing overhead (such as Iceland, where you're going). If you want to include some foreground as well as a large portion of the sky, a 14mm field of view makes an enormous difference -- one that more than compensates for its narrower aperture, in my opinion.

When the aurora can be seen significantly south of the arctic (e.g., in Minnesota, or even Mexico, where it reportedly appeared in 1859!), it will more often be hovering near the horizon. In those situations, a 24mm view may work better from a compositional perspective and the wider aperature of the prime would be a plus.

0 upvotes
eagle_I
By eagle_I (7 months ago)

Images of the Northern Lights have always captivated me. Even with no chance of ever experiencing or photographing them I very much enjoyed your well written article. And the photos .... WOW! Thanks so much for the best I've ever seen!

0 upvotes
yuyucheu
By yuyucheu (7 months ago)

very nice auroral photos. I realy want to go to north to having looks.

0 upvotes
Booorrris
By Booorrris (7 months ago)

Very nice article.

I plan to go to Iceland near next Spring Equinoxe and hope to see some aurora.
I need a fast wide lens. The article cites the Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8.
Has anyone tried the new 24 f/1.4 for aurora photography ?

0 upvotes
fred schumacher
By fred schumacher (7 months ago)

You don't have to go so far. Northern Minnesota, western Ontario and Manitoba are straight south of the magnetic north pole. I've gotten excellent northern lights photos off the deck of my house in the "bush" near Orr, MN, where there are few people and few lights.

For equipment, a manual Olympus OM-1 with a 21mm f2 Zuiko does the trick. No batteries to worry about in the 40 below weather. It always works. No muss, no fuss, and cheap.

Having no indoor toilet and having to go to the outhouse is a great aid in getting northern lights shots. It gets you outside at night. By the way, Highway 11 along the south side of the Rainy River is called the Under the Dancing Sky Highway in honor of the northern lights.

0 upvotes
Road Lice
By Road Lice (7 months ago)

Re: Frozen batteries

I do not travel with a car to warm batteries. My photo safaris consist of being outdoors for days at a time. I hit a pocket of air south of Yellowknife that went below the lowest capability of my thermometer (-50C). My camera batteries stopped working and it was a beautiful clear evening due to the cold temperatures. I have not come up with a battery solution. The only thing I can think of is wiring up some kind of contraption to make the camera use disposable lithium batteries (which work in cold temperatures).

Yes you can store batteries in a vest under your jacket but at -40 they freeze the instant you put them in the camera.

0 upvotes
Bronze Age Man
By Bronze Age Man (7 months ago)

Well written article, very informative. Working in the Canadian north I've seen them frequently. Keeping the camera warm is an issue. I've had batteries die forever at -40C.
Sadly most people never even see a real night sky, it is spectacular!
A small but thick polystyrene box with warm packs will keep the camera warm until you see the aurora, better than the humid inside of your parka.

A quick release head is essential, one you can operate with gloves. Fleece liner with winter mit works well.

Few Canadians have northern clothing! If you can't borrow the right stuff it gets very expensive. -100F boots are a real joy!

0 upvotes
JPnyc
By JPnyc (7 months ago)

... oh, now i see where the better comments are ... why are there 2 'comments' sections though?

0 upvotes
Ipsofoto
By Ipsofoto (7 months ago)

x

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
mazzy80
By mazzy80 (7 months ago)

For DX Kits, the single best len out of there is for sure the tokina 11-16 F/2.8 by far.
It's very sharp even wide-open, the vignetting is a problem only at 11-12, but you can easy correct it after; and the corner sharpness isn't a big deal in the night with a moving target.
For long exposure the difference between F/2.8 Vs F/4 is huge, it cost you 10-15 secs (you really want keep the time under 15 sec) or a step up from at least 800-1600 ISO with more noise less dynamic range.

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 11 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
RHJ
By RHJ (7 months ago)

Canadian aurora borialis photographer Zoltan Kenwell has taken some excellent images.

If you are interested in this type of photograpy, have a look at his web-site:

http://www.infocusimagery.com/

He has recently posted some time lapse video which is very interesting as well as some shots with purple auroras.

All his shots are taken outside of Edmonton, Alberta. It shows that you do not need to go that far north to obtain these images!!!

1 upvote
Lan
By Lan (7 months ago)

An excellent article; and some really great shots too Ben!

I'd add a sachet or two of silica gel to the warming-up-bag to further reduce the risk of condensation. I'd also make sure that people remember to get the camera out of the bag eventually. If there's moisture and you're in the warm, your camera lens is at risk of fungal attack if you leave it in there for a few days. Getting it cleaned will be expensive.

I didn't realise that my CF tripod could have problems in the very cold, so thankyou for that warning; I'll be more gentle with it in future! I prefer CF tripods over metal tripods in the very cold; if you get stuck to them it'll take less heat to get unstuck ;)

For those from milder climates (like me, in England) the polar cold is something you need to treat with respect. You might think you know what cold is, but unless you've been up there, you probably don't. I know I didn't. Luckily I had a tame Canadian who led me in the right direction, others might not be so lucky...

0 upvotes
dopravopat
By dopravopat (7 months ago)

Thanks for the article and posted examples! Nice reading and even nicer watching.

0 upvotes
jcmarfilph
By jcmarfilph (7 months ago)

Awesome and I envy people seeing personally this magnificent display of nature.

0 upvotes
Simon Zeev
By Simon Zeev (7 months ago)

I not plan to shoot auroras but I enjoyed very much to read the article.
Thank you!

0 upvotes
Maraya
By Maraya (7 months ago)

Thank you so much for such an informative article with absolutely stunning shots. Not only was the article great for capture of Aurora shots but for me it contained some very valuable info on cold weather photography. Judging by the winter weather predictions for this year for where I live that info will be vital. It will be either stay inside and keep your camera equipment and self warm or get out and catch some great cold weather shots.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
joe mccabe
By joe mccabe (7 months ago)

Very good & informative article. Thanks!

One potential problem I didn't see mentioned was frost build up on your lens. Here in Southeast Alaska we seldom have arid, cold weather - there always seems to be some moisture in the air. When out for hours photographing auroras, frost can eventually build up on the surface of the lens. It pays to keep checking for this. 5 tips to help avoid the problem are 1) keep your lens covered when not shooting, 2) strap chemical hand warmers to the lens barre to keep it warm, 3) keep the lens pointed downwards when not shooting, 4) don't exhale near/towards the lens and 5) use a lens shade.

Happy aurora hunting! Cheers!

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
1 upvote
SimenO1
By SimenO1 (7 months ago)

About exposure time and ISO. I prefer 1-5 seconds exposure to catch the "fibres of light". The higher ISO and noise are in my opinion worth it.

If the intensity is low its not possible and you have to opt for the second best. A fast lens and camera with good high ISO is always helping.

Both space weather and earth weather have to be good to take aurora photos. A couple of weeks dosent garantee you a match, but i think two weeks give you good chances (80%?).

0 upvotes
SimenO1
By SimenO1 (7 months ago)

About the location Tromsø, Norway. The city lights are easy to eliminate. Just leave the city and enyoy the dramatic costal landscape. The weather tends to vary a lot along the cost, so you should plan on spending some time to get the most out of the stay. Northern Sweeden and Finland offers a better weather, but far less dramatic landscape. Mostly flat and foresty. The northern Norwegian coastline has lots and lots of fjords surrounded by 1000m peeks. Nearby sites worth checking out is Ersfjorden, Lyngen, Senja, Andøya, Vesterålen and Lofoten. Google theese names + aurora.

The temperatures is usually not below -10 C near the coast, but it can be quite windy so bring a sturty tripod and warm clothes.

0 upvotes
Cy Cheze
By Cy Cheze (7 months ago)

The "skinny": To see auroras, one must go to the Arctic regions in midwinter darkness, have a clear sky on a frigid night, go 30-40 miles away from any city lights, and preferrably pick a year that fits one of the solar cycles (every 22, 87, or 210 years). To photograph them, you better keep the batteries warm and not freeze your own fingers or nose, either.

I'd truly wonder how you could photograph the auroras with a full moon in the frame. Do montage and layering help? I presume that most of the shots involve some enhancement relative to what the naked eye actually sees. This also happens with astronomical or microsopic imaging, but the boundary between nature photography and painting may be a dim swath of of green.

Where are the red, purple, or violet aurorae? The samples are all emerald. No multi-color "shows" on a given night? Is it necessary to pick another season or year?

0 upvotes
SimenO1
By SimenO1 (7 months ago)

Other colors appear mosty when its intense. Its when the solar wind reaches deeper in the atmosphere and exites other gases then those in the uppermost atmosphere. Colors can appear and disappear. Theese color briefs can last from seconds to hours. Most of the time its just emarald.

When its intense, you can have the moon in the frame without over exposing. But i like to shoot a different direction and get aurora pictures with moonlit landscape.

0 upvotes
Henrik Herranen
By Henrik Herranen (7 months ago)

Slight correction: The shortest solar cycle is 11, not 22 years. Also, there isn't any "pre-known" top year. The top of the solar cycle can (and usually does) last for several years.

0 upvotes
Poul Jensen
By Poul Jensen (7 months ago)

Indeed, most of the time the naked eye does not see the colors that the camera does - it needs a certain intensity of light to be able to identify colors. So most of the aurora in these shots would actually look pale white with a hint of green, but when the aurora gets really bright (and especially if it's overhead) you do get to see the colors.

Also, the colors actually do depend on season and time of night.

Magenta lower borders occur mostly in evening and around midnight. They are hard to capture because they come in brief and bright bursts, and you'll have to dial down the exposure quickly and just right not to overexpose and wash out the magenta.

Often you also get a different color at the top of curtains - red or blue. If the sun is shining at the altitude of the curtain tops (close to sunset/sunrise) it will be blue. If it's solidly in Earth's shadow it will be red, and during transition you can get a beautiful mix of blue and red.

Comment edited 11 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Jan3x5
By Jan3x5 (7 months ago)

Possibly the best photographic article on DPR so far, very comprehensive and full of stunning pictures, many thanks!

Just curious why namely the Tromsø is included, when you can capture that in so many locations in Norway (well, in Sweden, Finland or Russia too!) and there are better places even in Norway (possibly not in Troms but Finnmark county, which is the nothernmost part of Norway). Wondering if the reason is airport in Tromsø?

0 upvotes
SimenO1
By SimenO1 (7 months ago)

I guess its the airport. Its the largest airline hub in the area, and not nearly as expensive as tickets to I.E. Båtsfjord. Its also the larges city in the area with lots of photo enthusiasts spreading aurora pictures on the net. Me being one of them. Thus, probably the most known aurora place in the region, according to photo count on the internet. Its worth noting the that the dramatic landscape along the whole coastline from Kirkenes to Bodø could enhance aurora photos.

0 upvotes
Stein Nilsen
By Stein Nilsen (7 months ago)

Tromsø and Troms County has ice free fjords, majestic mountains, valleys and great access to different locations in Northern Norway. Within 2 hours drive you can go to Finland or other locations. Check out http://nng.no and come and see. Less than 2 hours flight from Oslo and 40GBP/80USD one way.

0 upvotes
Jan3x5
By Jan3x5 (6 months ago)

I know Troms and Finnmark counties (and many more in Norway) quite well as I am going there almost each year (by car, a much better option than the plane!). This was exactly the reason I was asking why namely Tromsø is listed.

0 upvotes
ag0176
By ag0176 (7 months ago)

Thanks for crisp and clear information. And for maintaining a tinge of well-intended humor.

0 upvotes
bajanshutterbug
By bajanshutterbug (7 months ago)

Just beautiful, and one of those cool folks who share all they have, and all they know.. Thanks ben. Tony Webster, Barbados

0 upvotes
Tomix
By Tomix (7 months ago)

Simply brilliant!

0 upvotes
dtra
By dtra (7 months ago)

Awesome article, and great information, I will be going to Iceland at xmas time, so hopefully I can remember (to bookmark this page at least) and I can capture something remotely close to the great pictures you've displayed here.

0 upvotes
intrnst
By intrnst (7 months ago)

Thanks for sharing your not so easily attainable experience and knowledge. Nice reading, unusual photos.

0 upvotes
photo nuts
By photo nuts (7 months ago)

Brilliant post. The person who doubts the description of the science behind aurora in this article ought to examine his own understanding.

0 upvotes
julieng
By julieng (7 months ago)

If its to keep focus to infinity without hassle while traveling to Bodö, Iceland or Greenland, I'd spare some of the budget for a Leica M9 with a summilux

0 upvotes
inunnguaq
By inunnguaq (7 months ago)

Great article,- I live in Greenland and see this all the time,- well during winter. Aurora and ice are 2 subjects you never get tired of.
Great website by the way, enjoyed looking.
happy shooting

Comment edited 7 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Torgny Dellsen
By Torgny Dellsen (7 months ago)

Exquisite, instructive article

0 upvotes
Top Dog Imaging
By Top Dog Imaging (7 months ago)

Excellent article and pictures. Living in Central Florida, I don't see sights like this in the night sky. Nor, am I inclined to venture out into super cold climates to experience arorae firsthand. The photos are beautiful and they do appeal to me on a visceral level. People with red-green color blindness are at a disadvantage.

0 upvotes
Ben Hattenbach
By Ben Hattenbach (7 months ago)

Hi Folks. Thanks very much for all the positive feedback. It will help keep me warm on my next photoshoot. Poul, with respect to your comment on the science, the scientific portion of the article (Section 1) was provided by a Ph.D. astrophysicist who, as a professor and researcher, has studied aurorae not only on earth but on other planets. It was intended to be understandable by lay people, not a comprehensive dissertation; nonetheless, I believe (and sure hope) it is entierly accurate from a scientific perspective.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
Poul Jensen
By Poul Jensen (7 months ago)

You did well then, but I would have some arguments with the astrophysicist (Henry Throop I take it) who authored your Section 1 and 2. That discussion doesn't belong here, but I would like to point out that when you are watching the aurora, you are not seeing "focused solar wind" or turbulence created by the solar wind blowing by the magnetosphere as you might think from this article. You are watching processes internal to Earth's magnetosphere (though, ultimately the energy fueling these processes does come from the solar wind).

1 upvote
JPnyc
By JPnyc (7 months ago)

Thank you!
Other than that, I am at a loss for words ...

0 upvotes
Poul Jensen
By Poul Jensen (7 months ago)

While there is plenty of good info/advice for aspiring aurora photographers, the author is not on top of the science behind the aurora and would have done well to have the article revised by someone who is. But then, while the article wouldn't pass a scientific review, the details that are off are practically irrelevant since this is a photography and not a science forum...

0 upvotes
Total comments: 79
12