Street Photography = street robbery?
There are increasingly people who think photography is robbery. They seem to equate a gun and a camera.
If a robber makes a robbery and takes away my material possessions or a photographer / a photographer shots a photo of me without asking me and takes away intangibles – what’s the difference?
The robber took my material goods, the photographer took my intangible assets – in that case a part of my personal/individual rights like the right to decide about pictures of myself.
|photoy by michael mahlke|
We live in a democracy and believe to personal/individual/human rights. The self-determination over the own data (which just today also photos are) is an important human right in the digital age.
So I think in the field of streetphotography – as one example – you can see how far people accept the human and personal/individual rights – or if they make an partliy immaterial identity theft as well as the violation of individual/personal rights.
If anyone should see it differently, I’m curious about the reasoning.
Last but not least I have learned Oxford Standard English at school and I hope that the main thoughts are clear.
Flag as inappropriate
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by dpreview.com or any affiliated companies.