Studio in the Wild

For most of us, studio photography calls to mind fashion, portrait and product shoots. Rock stars, glamorous models, and designer accessories are what we expect to see in front of a seamless backdrop surrounded by flash units. But capturing wildlife in front of a white background is growing in popularity among nature photographers and stock agencies seem to be very keen to get their hands on these kinds of images.

In the field studio the subject is photographed in front of a white background and illuminated with two flash units, bringing out detail and showcasing the translucent qualities of the species.
Subject: Snakelocks Anemone (Photographed in a tank)

Although he was not the first to do it, many credit Scottish nature photographer Niall Benvie with taking the idea of what's now called field studio photography to a whole new level. The essence of field studio photography is that the studio comes to the subject. The idea is simple in concept, if not necessarily in execution. You're isolating the subject from its environment and illuminating it with flash.

To do this you'll need a white translucent background, two flash units with sync capability and a means of safely positioning your subject in the frame. The subject is then illuminated both from the back with the flash firing through the white background and from the front via fill flash.

Wildlife can be placed in a clear acrylic bowl or tank which will not be visible in the photograph.
Subject: Flat Topshell (Photographed in a tank)

As you can imagine this approach requires a bit more equipment than traditional nature photography. Apart from the camera, lens and flash units there are various bits and pieces you need to make the whole thing work. To fire the flash you need sync cables or a wireless flash system. I wholeheartedly recommend the latter. The good ones are not cheap but after repeatedly tripping over cables, nearly bringing down the whole setup I happily invested in a wireless flash system.

You will also need tripods or light stands on which to mount the flash units. While you could certainly bring a third tripod for the camera, I prefer the flexibility of shooting handheld in the field studio. A diffuser or softbox for the flash and reflectors are also helpful in many situations.

When photographing flowers and
plants, clamps and rods (placed
out of the scene) are often necessary
to hold the subject in position.
Subject: Bramble
The overriding ethos of field studio
photography is to leave your
subjects unharmed. These plants
were not uprooted.
Subject: Common Knapweed

The most crucial part of the whole undertaking is undoubtedly the background. White Polymethyl Methacrylate, better known as Perspex or Lucite, is the material of choice. When shooting flora, a simple sheet of the material will suffice. For active wildlife the setup becomes a bit more elaborate. A makeshift transparent bowl placed on or over the background or a tank built of Perspex with a clear front can form the basis of a field studio for all kinds of the crawling, jumping, running or swimming fauna.

For all of the logistical complications, composition is very straightforward as there is no need to arrange multiple items in the frame. There is only a solitary subject, placed directly in the middle of the field studio. The choice of subject can be crucial, however. The goal is to use the best possible representative of the species you want to photograph. And finding that textbook specimen can take some time and effort.

The goal is to get a perfect white background while not overexposing the subject. Finding the perfect amount of lighting output is therefore the most important (and trickiest) part of the whole endeavor. I always use both flashes in manual mode and place a diffuser on the front fill flash. The diffuser not only creates a softer, more natural light but even more importantly, causes less distress for the animals.

You use fill flash to bring out details in the subject and create a subtle highlights...
Subject: Hermit Crab (Photographed in a tank)
...without making it overly obvious that flash was used.
Subject: Shore Crab (Photographed in a bowl)

The flash placed behind the Perspex will light the subject from the back, bringing out any translucent qualities. The aim here is to overexpose the background. If your camera has a highlight warning alert it is very helpful to turn it on. When the entire background blinks while the subject itself has maintained good detail throughout, you've got the correct flash output settings and camera exposure.

Flash output and exposure can be controlled in several ways. You can control output of the flash units themselves by adjusting the power setting or moving the flash units closer to or further away from the subject. Alternatively you can adjust the ISO setting or change the distance between subject and background. The last method can be especially helpful when working with white or very translucent plants and animals.

Exposure is largely going to be a matter of trial and error though. But don't despair. After a few sessions you will get a feeling for the appropriate exposure for a particular subject. My basic settings are always f22, 1/200sec., ISO 200 with background flash on full power and the fill flash on a low to medium setting. I start with a test exposure using the background flash only. Once I have rendered the background to my liking I add the fill flash and eventually make the picture.

Plants and flowers offer the easiest opportunities to start field studio photography. They don’t run away and most don’t have highly reflective or translucent surfaces.
Subject: Herb Robert

Photographing animals raises the degree of difficulty, as they tend to move around. Insects and amphibians often have wet or reflective skin, which can cause nasty highlights. Working with a tank brings additional problems. Debris in the water or bubbles sticking to the front glass are just a few of the problems that may need to be overcome. A box of Q-Tips and a soft cloth to clean the front pane and a few bottles of still mineral water (when working with freshwater creatures) can be a big help here. When working with saltwater creatures the best you can do is find the cleanest tidal pool, sieve the water through a cloth (or simply wait until most of the debris has settled) and use that in your tank.

Subject: Montagu’s Bleeny (Photographed in a tank)

I can't stress enough that the welfare of the subject should always be your main priority. Plants shouldn’t be uprooted and sessions with animals should be as short as possible in order to cause minimal stress to the involuntary (and unpaid) model. The old motto ‘Take only pictures, leave only footprints’ applies.

This kind of photography requires some important post-processing work so it is essential to shoot in Raw format. Shooting Raw gives you greater flexibility and control during the editing stage and can result in a higher quality image file. Most of my processing is done in Lightroom. Activating the ‘highlight clipping’ feature instantly shows whether the background is correctly overexposed. All RGB channels should read 100% (or 255 if you're using Photoshop). You want the subject to exhibit relatively strong contrast and fine detail. Because we have purposefully overexposed the background, creating a lighter overall image, achieving this aim typically requires some image editing. Lightroom and Photoshop have no shortage of tools to adjust brightness, contrast and saturation. It is important, however, to make sure that any adjustments are properly masked so that they are applied only to the subject, with the background remaining maximum white. Once satisfied with the image, I use Lightroom to export a TIFF or JPEG compatible with any other editing and/or image viewing software.

There are certainly easier ways to capture nature images than what I've outlined here, but once you have mastered the technique you are rewarded with truly unique images.

Subject: Hatched Burnet Moth

Field studio fever is spreading around the world. In 2010 Niall Benvie and US photographer Clay Bolt launched the Meet Your Neighbours project. The goal of this undertaking is to show the often overlooked and undervalued common wildlife, the flora and fauna that thrive on our doorsteps. The message is ‘biodiversity matters’, which basically means the common frog under the garden shed is just as important as the mighty lion in the far away African savannah.


Carsten Krieger is a professional landscape and wildlife photographer based in the West Ireland and author of several books on the Irish landscape and nature. To find out more about his work please visit his website: www.carstenkrieger.com

7
Flag as inappropriate

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by dpreview.com or any affiliated companies.

Share:
Print view

Comments

Total comments: 24
nearlythere
By nearlythere (Dec 24, 2011)

Gorgeous pictures! I love the ethos as well.

I was looking for a photo of the process, you know, to show the tank or the paper, and show how the photographer set it up. If there's a follow up, I'd be delighted to see more. I guess I can go google it :)

0 upvotes
George E620
By George E620 (Sep 15, 2011)

Thank you dpreview and CarstenKriegerPhotography. A very interesting article. I am going to try some of the techniques described but as I have a more documentary(/less artistic) approach my aperture setting will be about F/8 rather than F/22.

0 upvotes
Reilly Diefenbach
By Reilly Diefenbach (Sep 15, 2011)

This look doesn't do it for me.

3 upvotes
totemjoe
By totemjoe (Sep 15, 2011)

I'm with you Reilly. If these were mine, I'd retake them.

1 upvote
yehudakgtbnet
By yehudakgtbnet (Sep 17, 2011)

Same thing here.

0 upvotes
wutsurstyle
By wutsurstyle (Sep 20, 2011)

This article was not meant to have a certain "look" or tell a "story". It mentioned in the beginning that it was for stock photography where companies buy these images and later manipulate them into backgrounds of their choice. I still agree, however, that rather than just pictures, the article would've faired better with shots of the overall setup so that we readers can learn behind the scenes.

1 upvote
casualShots
By casualShots (Sep 15, 2011)

For those complaining of not getting photos of the setup. I think the description of the setup was good enough to reproduce on my own.
Atleast its explained here unlike other recent articles on DP review..

0 upvotes
bmadau
By bmadau (Sep 14, 2011)

I think most of the problem is with how dpreview displays images in posts. If you click on each photo to see the original in a new window (or tab), they look 1000% better.

Interesting but still not my cup of tea. this is more along my idea of taking the studio into the field-
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-h9cm5USYSxQ/TmYe1roV7UI/AAAAAAAABTc/UaEFU_xfdnQ/DSC05564_web.jpg

BM

1 upvote
Desert Cruiser
By Desert Cruiser (Sep 14, 2011)

Sorry I should have included this in the first post. Link to an example

http://i745.photobucket.com/albums/xx91/DesertCruiser13/Forum/Penstemonclose-1.png

0 upvotes
eyedo
By eyedo (Sep 15, 2011)

A lot of background noise or hot pixels in that shot on the background.

0 upvotes
Jason Butler
By Jason Butler (Sep 15, 2011)

That's not noise or hot-pixels. It is the actual background, complete with texture & dust. This is what happens when the background is WAY too close to the subject.

1 upvote
Klaus dk
By Klaus dk (Sep 14, 2011)

I understand why this technique is getting popular. This is the way artists have drawn specimens of flora and fauna for centuries, totally isolated from any background. Truly aesthetic and very well done!

0 upvotes
Desert Cruiser
By Desert Cruiser (Sep 14, 2011)

Try this using a black 1/4 inch foam board from Walmart (less than $2) for a better effect. Black usually works better.

0 upvotes
sonoranowl
By sonoranowl (Sep 14, 2011)

Excellent article. I like the effect. Can't wait to try out this process.

0 upvotes
inevitable crafts studio
By inevitable crafts studio (Sep 14, 2011)

i like the review section of this page

0 upvotes
Graystar
By Graystar (Sep 14, 2011)

A few pictures of the setup with background and flash units in place would have been helpful.

None of those images really thrilled me.

4 upvotes
dtra
By dtra (Sep 14, 2011)

Exactly what I was thinking, I was scrolling through waiting for the picture of the setup.

0 upvotes
pickledherring
By pickledherring (Sep 15, 2011)

Yes, please. A picture of the setup would be much appreciated.

0 upvotes
BPJosh
By BPJosh (Sep 14, 2011)

The images need contrast and a little clarity.
Save images, open in ACR, and contrast and clarity and the images look 10x better. Try it!

0 upvotes
Paullubbock
By Paullubbock (Sep 14, 2011)

unusual technique, not really understanding the overexposed soft look, it just looks wrong.

1 upvote
CarstenKriegerPhotography
By CarstenKriegerPhotography (Sep 14, 2011)

It's not just you. The backgrounds are overexposed deliberately, it's the whole idea of this technique. It's all explained in the article.

0 upvotes
lamah
By lamah (Sep 16, 2011)

There's a difference between achieving a white background, and having a background lit so hot that it destroys the edges of the subject.

0 upvotes
Pedagydusz
By Pedagydusz (Sep 16, 2011)

It very interesting, but for my taste the results are not all equally achieved (though I suppose that can be said of anything).
I am a bit baffled as to what are really the objectives (yes, I read the article). If it is to produce beautiful images of nature subjects - yes, they are beautiful, though some photographs of plants and flowers with beautiful bokeh are difficult to surpass.
It the aim is to render an "illustration", then the result is miles behind real illustrations, and a more aggressive pp would be necessary. For example the crab or hermit (?) on the left has appendages that extend sideways that are barely visible. I am ready to believe that this is how they look like, but for illustration purposes they would need some enhancing.
In general, I would say: very beautiful, not quite as I see things in Nature!
But I will give it a try. Thank you for a great article!
BTW: Who am I to criticize a professional photographer? This is not a critique, is just an opinion.

1 upvote
bigdaddave
By bigdaddave (Sep 14, 2011)

Is it just me or are the backgrounds all overexposed and the subjects soft?

0 upvotes
Total comments: 24